Soil organic carbon, carbon fractions, and microbial community under various organic amendments
The impact of various organic amendments on soil organic carbon (SOC) have rarely been reported. To address this, a laboratory experiment was designed to scrutinize the effects of different amendments on soil carbon fractions, microbial communities, and the underlying interactive mechanisms. The exp...
Saved in:
Published in | Scientific reports Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 25431 - 11 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
25.10.2024
Nature Publishing Group Nature Portfolio |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The impact of various organic amendments on soil organic carbon (SOC) have rarely been reported. To address this, a laboratory experiment was designed to scrutinize the effects of different amendments on soil carbon fractions, microbial communities, and the underlying interactive mechanisms. The experiment encompassed a no-amendment control (CK), as well as treatments with corn straw (CS), tobacco stalks (TS), and peanut shell biochar (PB). Over a 70-day incubation, the SOC in plots amended with CS, TS, and PB displayed significant boosts of 13.9%, 17.5%, and 44.8%, respectively, compared to the CK. For soil carbon fractions, amendments with PB, TS, and CS led to a dramatic rise in particulate organic carbon (POC) of 27.4%, 20.2%, and 105.7%, respectively, in contrast to the CK plots. Mantel analysis and structural Equation Modeling uncovered strong interrelationships among the
cbbL, cbbM
,
Bacteroidota
, TOC, and POC. Organic amendments enhance soil carbon fractions, modulating the microbial community by increasing
Bacteroidetes
abundance and suppressing
Acidobacteria
richness, thereby influencing the abundance of key carbon cycle genes such as
cbbL
and
cbbM
. These results suggest that the addition of peanut shell biochar significantly boosted TOC and key carbon fractions, enhancing carbon content and soil fertility. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-024-75771-w |