AFM methods for studying the morphology and micromechanical properties of the membrane of human buccal epithelium cell
Using AFM methods in air under normal conditions in a wide range of local force effects ( F const < 40 μN) the relief, functional micromechanical properties (elasticity coefficient K , Young’s modulus E , elastic Δ h dfrm and plastic Δ h stiff deformations) and adhesive properties (work A of adhe...
Saved in:
Published in | Scientific reports Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 10917 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
05.07.2023
Nature Publishing Group Nature Portfolio |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Using AFM methods in air under normal conditions in a wide range of local force effects (
F
const
< 40 μN) the relief, functional micromechanical properties (elasticity coefficient
K
, Young’s modulus
E
, elastic
Δ
h
dfrm
and plastic
Δ
h
stiff
deformations) and adhesive properties (work
A
of adhesive forces
F
adh
=
F
adh
(
x
;
y
)
) of the membranes of living adult cells of human buccal epithelium were studied in the presence of a protective layer < 100 nm of buffer solution that prevented the cells from drying. Almost all geometric and functional characteristics of the membrane in the local approximation at the micro- and nanolevels are affected by size effects and obey the laws of fractal geometry. The Brownian multifractal relief of the membrane is characterized by dimension
D
f
< 2.56 and irregularities < 500 nm vertically and < 2 μm horizontally. Its response to elastic (≤ 6
nN
), active (6–21 nN), or passive (> 21 nN) stimulation (
F
const
) is a non-trivial selective process and exhibits a correspondingly elastic (
K
=
67.4 N/m), active (
K
=
80.2 N/m) and passive (
K
=
84.5 N/m) responses.
K
=
K
(
F
const
)
and
E
=
E
(
F
const
)
depend on
F
const
. Having undergone slight plastic deformations
Δ
h
stiff
< 300 nm, the membrane is capable of restoring its shape. We mapped (
E
=
E
(
x
;
y
)
,
D
f
= 2.56;
Δ
h
dfrm
=
Δ
h
dfrm
(
x
;
y
)
,
D
f
= 2.68;
Δ
h
stiff
=
Δ
h
stiff
(
x
;
y
)
,
D
f
= 2.42,
A
=
A
x
;
y
and
F
adh
=
F
adh
(
x
;
y
)
) indicating its complex cavernous structure. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-023-33881-x |