The impact of commodity price risk management on the profits of a company

It is well recognized that for the producing companies hedging the commodity price using financial products like forwards or futures has become an important part of the company's production process. But apart from the direct impacts of hedging on the production and hedging costs the use of fina...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inResources policy Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 346 - 353
Main Authors Buhl, Hans Ulrich, Strauß, Sofie, Wiesent, Julia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2011
Elsevier
SeriesResources Policy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:It is well recognized that for the producing companies hedging the commodity price using financial products like forwards or futures has become an important part of the company's production process. But apart from the direct impacts of hedging on the production and hedging costs the use of financial products affects the financing of the company: hedging the volatile commodity prices leads to a reduction of the risk premium the company has to pay for its debt capital, since hedging contributes to more confidence of the investors in the redemption of the debt. In this paper we therefore analyze this dependency of hedging and financing and derive optimal hedging extents for companies in different market situations based on a long-term model. By hedging the commodity price, companies can realize a surplus in profits. Thereby, the optimal hedging extent for a monopolist is often up to 100%, whereas for companies in a polypolistic market the optimum is always less than 100%. These results are illustrated by examples for a producing company. ► The paper analyzes the dependency of hedging the commodity price risk on the financing of a company. ► By hedging the commodity price, companies can realize a surplus in profits. ► We derive optimal hedging extents for companies in different market situations. ► Optimal hedging extent for a monopolist is often up to 100%. ► In a polypolistic market the optimal hedging extent is always less than 100%.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0301-4207
1873-7641
DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2011.07.003