Target Interception: Hand-Eye Coordination and Strategies

This study was designed to define the characteristics of eye–hand coordination in a task requiring the interception of a moving target. It also assessed the extent to which the motion of the target was predicted and the strategies subjects used to determine when to initiate target interception. Targ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of neuroscience Vol. 27; no. 27; pp. 7297 - 7309
Main Authors Mrotek, Leigh A, Soechting, John F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Soc Neuroscience 04.07.2007
Society for Neuroscience
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0270-6474
1529-2401
1529-2401
DOI10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2046-07.2007

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study was designed to define the characteristics of eye–hand coordination in a task requiring the interception of a moving target. It also assessed the extent to which the motion of the target was predicted and the strategies subjects used to determine when to initiate target interception. Target trajectories were constructed from sums of sines in the horizontal and vertical dimensions. Subjects intercepted these trajectories by moving their index finger along the surface of a display monitor. They were free to initiate the interception at any time, and on successful interception, the target disappeared. Although they were not explicitly instructed to do so, subjects tracked target motion with normal, high-gain smooth-pursuit eye movements right up until the target was intercepted. However, the probability of catch-up saccades was substantially depressed shortly after the onset of manual interception. The initial direction of the finger movement anticipated the motion of the target by ∼150 ms. For any given trajectory, subjects tended to initiate interception at predictable times that depended on the characteristics of the target trajectories [i.e., when the curvature (or angular velocity) of the target was small and when the target was moving toward the finger]. The relative weighting of various parameters that influenced the decision to initiate interception varied from subject to subject and was not accounted for by a model based on the short-range predictability of target motion.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0270-6474
1529-2401
1529-2401
DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2046-07.2007