The efficacy and safety of ultrasonic bone scalpel for removing retrovertebral osteophytes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective study

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 80 - 7
• Main Authors: Yao, Zhi, Zhang, Shishuang, Liu, Weijun, Wei, Mengcheng, Fang, Weizhi, Li, Qingbo, Cai, Lei, Wang, Zhengkun, Zhou, Chuankun, Zhou, Yichi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 02.01.2024; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 692/308; 692/699; Back surgery; Blood; Blood Loss, Surgical; Bone grafts; Cartilage; Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging; Cervical Vertebrae - surgery; Diskectomy - adverse effects; Diskectomy - methods; Hospitals; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; multidisciplinary; Osteophyte - surgery; Osteophytes; Patients; Retrospective Studies; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Skin & tissue grafts; Spinal cord injuries; Spinal Fusion - methods; Statistical analysis; Trauma; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonics
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50545-y

In this study, we present a novel surgical method that utilizes the ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS) for the removal of large retrovertebral osteophytes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and evaluate its safety and efficacy in comparison to the traditional approach of using high-speed drill (HSD). A total of 56 patients who underwent ACDF for retrovertebral osteophytes were selected. We recorded patients' baseline information, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, JOA and VAS scores, and other relevant data. The mean operation time and the mean intraoperative blood loss in the UBS group were less than those in the HSD group (P < 0.05). Although both groups exhibited considerable improvements in JOA and VAS scores following surgery, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Additionally, no significant disparities were found in bone graft fusion between the two groups at 6- and 12-months postsurgery. Notably, neither group exhibited complications such as dura tear or spinal cord injury. Our study found that the use of UBS reduced operative time, minimized surgical bleeding, and led to clinical outcomes comparable to HSD in ACDF. This technique offers an effective and safe method of removing large retrovertebral osteophytes.