BOURDIEU'S CONCEPT OF REFLEXIVITY AS METALITERACY

For Bourdieu, the extent to which agents can attain knowledge of, and negotiate, various cultural fields is dependent upon, and explicable in terms of, two epistemological types. The first is a practical sense (the 'logic of practice'), while the second involves a sort of conscious compreh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCultural studies (London, England) Vol. 17; no. 3-4; pp. 539 - 553
Main Authors Schirato, Tony, Webb, Jen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis Group 01.05.2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0950-2386
1466-4348
DOI10.1080/0950238032000083935

Cover

Abstract For Bourdieu, the extent to which agents can attain knowledge of, and negotiate, various cultural fields is dependent upon, and explicable in terms of, two epistemological types. The first is a practical sense (the 'logic of practice'), while the second involves a sort of conscious comprehension that he names 'reflexivity'. Bourdieu defines reflexivity as an interrogation of the three types of limitations (of social position, of field and of the scholastic point of view) that are constitutive of knowledge itself. But the reflexive relation to the habitus, the demands and influences exerted by cultural fields, and one's own practices within those fields, cannot be understood simply as something that is obtained by the subject; rather, any reflexive relation to the doxa and illusio of the field must be a constitutive part of that field. This paper identifies a number of principles taken from Bourdieu's work that clarify how, where and why the reflexive 'surpassing' of literacy might occur. But we also suggest, contra Bourdieu, that only fields that are informed or characterized by the scholastic point of view are likely to be characterized by the set of conditions constitutive of reflexive knowledge; and that the scholastic point of view is therefore, simultaneously, both a potential impediment to, and a condition (almost necessary) of the production of reflexive knowledge.
AbstractList For Bourdieu, the extent to which agents can attain knowledge of, and negotiate, various cultural fields is dependent upon, and explicable in terms of, two epistemological types. The first is a practical sense (the 'logic of practice'), while the second involves a sort of conscious comprehension that he names 'reflexivity'. Bourdieu defines reflexivity as an interrogation of the three types of limitations (of social position, of field and of the scholastic point of view) that are constitutive of knowledge itself. But the reflexive relation to the habitus, the demands and influences exerted by cultural fields, and one's own practices within those fields, cannot be understood simply as something that is obtained by the subject; rather, any reflexive relation to the doxa and illusio of the field must be a constitutive part of that field. This paper identifies a number of principles taken from Bourdieu's work that clarify how, where and why the reflexive 'surpassing' of literacy might occur. But we also suggest, contra Bourdieu, that only fields that are informed or characterized by the scholastic point of view are likely to be characterized by the set of conditions constitutive of reflexive knowledge; and that the scholastic point of view is therefore, simultaneously, both a potential impediment to, and a condition (almost necessary) of the production of reflexive knowledge.. (Original abstract)
For Bourdieu, the extent to which agents can attain knowledge of, and negotiate, various cultural fields is dependent upon, and explicable in terms of, two epistemological types. The first is a practical sense (the 'logic of practice'), while the second involves a sort of conscious comprehension that he names 'reflexivity'. Bourdieu defines reflexivity as an interrogation of the three types of limitations (of social position, of field and of the scholastic point of view) that are constitutive of knowledge itself. But the reflexive relation to the habitus, the demands and influences exerted by cultural fields, and one's own practices within those fields, cannot be understood simply as something that is obtained by the subject; rather, any reflexive relation to the doxa and illusio of the field must be a constitutive part of that field. This paper identifies a number of principles taken from Bourdieu's work that clarify how, where and why the reflexive 'surpassing' of literacy might occur. But we also suggest, contra Bourdieu, that only fields that are informed or characterized by the scholastic point of view are likely to be characterized by the set of conditions constitutive of reflexive knowledge; and that the scholastic point of view is therefore, simultaneously, both a potential impediment to, and a condition (almost necessary) of the production of reflexive knowledge.
For Bourdieu, the extent to which agents can attain knowledge of, & negotiate, various cultural fields is dependent upon, & explicable in terms of, two epistemological types. The first is a practical sense (the 'logic of practice'), while the second involves a sort of conscious comprehension that he names 'reflexivity.' Bourdieu defines reflexivity as an interrogation of the three types of limitations (of social position, of field, & of the scholastic point of view) that are constitutive of knowledge itself. But the reflexive relation to the habitus, the demands & influences exerted by cultural fields, & one's own practices within those fields, cannot be understood simply as something that is obtained by the subject; rather, any reflexive relation to the doxa & illusio of the field must be a constitutive part of that field. This paper identifies a number of principles taken from Bourdieu's work that clarify how, where, & why the reflexive 'surpassing' of literacy might occur. But we also suggest, contra Bourdieu, that only fields that are informed or characterized by the scholastic point of view are likely to be characterized by the set of conditions constitutive of reflexive knowledge; & that the scholastic point of view is therefore, simultaneously, both a potential impediment to, & a condition (almost necessary) of the production of reflexive knowledge. 14 References. Adapted from the source document.
Author Webb, Jen
Schirato, Tony
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Tony
  surname: Schirato
  fullname: Schirato, Tony
  organization: University of Canberra, Australia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jen
  surname: Webb
  fullname: Webb, Jen
  organization: University of Canberra, Australia
BookMark eNqNkU9v0zAcQC00JLrBJ-CSE3AJ-L-dC1LJUojUrahLETtZbuKAURp3tivYt8clnNC04osPfu_JP_scnI1uNAC8RPAtghK-gwWDmEhIMExLkoKwJ2CGKOc5JVSegdmRyBPCn4HzEH4kikosZwB9WG3Wl3W1eX2TlavrsvrcZKtFtq4Wy-pr_aVubrP5TXZVNfNl3VTreXn7HDzt9RDMi7_7Bdgsqqb8lC9XH-tyvsxbRlHMMaKw0LzXvWEMU1OgrpVdSwSGFAkmC4hMrzHnYtuKrUTCpBsxqjvd420ntuQCvJq6e-_uDiZEtbOhNcOgR-MOQXFIOeScnQSZwAhBJE6CRFJZEAIT-OZREEHCRBqEyISSCW29C8GbXu293Wl_nyB1_Bv1wN8kq_jHam3U0boxem2HE-5icv3ORqX3uo_qe4z7oDodtbJj7_6cOP9Ndc4eW4QgrqwZEqxSicACEpRC76fQpOifzg-divp-cL73emxtepL_muKRwAOeir8i-Q1xHcvu
CODEN CUSTE9
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_09589236_2015_1111200
crossref_primary_10_3390_su2113465
crossref_primary_10_1080_09638180500124905
crossref_primary_10_3989_redc_2020_4_1728
crossref_primary_10_1080_01425690701737481
crossref_primary_10_1177_1350507617724882
crossref_primary_10_1108_20412561111166058
crossref_primary_10_1080_10911359_2020_1747585
crossref_primary_10_1080_10714410903132840
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1749_5687_2011_00135_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_09518390601176523
crossref_primary_10_1080_14742837_2012_664898
crossref_primary_10_15285_maruaebd_1311307
crossref_primary_10_1080_00336297_2012_749799
crossref_primary_10_1080_10862960802695172
crossref_primary_10_1177_1749975509356750
crossref_primary_10_1177_1477878505049832
crossref_primary_10_1080_09585192_2012_709190
crossref_primary_10_1111_beer_12787
crossref_primary_10_1111_jtsb_12025
crossref_primary_10_1177_003803850663672
crossref_primary_10_1177_1757743815600291
Cites_doi 10.1515/9781503621558
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2003
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2003
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
C18
8BJ
FQK
JBE
7QJ
7U4
BHHNA
DWI
WZK
DOI 10.1080/0950238032000083935
DatabaseName CrossRef
Humanities Index
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)
Sociological Abstracts
Sociological Abstracts
Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
British Humanities Index (BHI)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)
Sociological Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)

Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)
British Humanities Index (BHI)
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anthropology
Sociology & Social History
EISSN 1466-4348
EndPage 553
ExternalDocumentID 10_1080_0950238032000083935
10.3316/ielapa.200309031
10107017
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID -~X
.4H
.7I
.QK
0BK
0R~
29F
2DF
4.4
5GY
5VS
9M8
AACJB
AAGZJ
AAMFJ
AAMIU
AAPUL
AATTQ
AAYOK
AAZMC
ABCCY
ABDBF
ABFIM
ABJNI
ABLFX
ABLIJ
ABLJU
ABPEM
ABRLO
ABTAI
ABXUL
ABXYU
ABZLS
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACOSQ
ACTIO
ACTOA
ACUHS
ADAHI
ADCVX
ADKVQ
ADLRE
ADMHG
ADXPE
ADZJE
AECIN
AEISY
AEKEX
AEOZL
AEPSL
AEYOC
AEZRU
AFFNX
AFXOW
AGDLA
AGMYJ
AGRBW
AHDZW
AIJEM
AIWVS
AJWEG
AKBVH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
AVBZW
AWYRJ
BEJHT
BLEHA
BMOTO
BOHLJ
CAG
CCCUG
COF
CQ1
CS3
CYAYP
DGFLZ
DKSSO
DQTAE
DQUMV
DU5
EAP
EBS
EBTJD
EHI
EJD
EMK
EPL
ERP
ESI
ESO
ESX
E~B
E~C
G-F
GTTXZ
H13
HMHOC
HZ~
IPNFZ
J.O
KSZGM
KYCEM
M4Z
NA5
NY0
O9-
OHT
P2P
QKZAL
RIG
RNANH
ROSJB
RSYQP
S-F
STATR
TAE
TBQAZ
TCF
TDBHL
TFH
TFL
TFW
TIXVT
TN5
TNTFI
TRJHH
TUROJ
UPT
UT5
UT9
VAE
~01
~S~
3YN
ACLSK
AEGYZ
AFWLO
07Q
1PF
AAANZ
AAGDL
AAHIA
AAQBL
AAYXX
ACAAB
ACNLF
ADCHK
ADXHL
ADYSH
AEFOU
AEOPJ
AFHWJ
AFRVT
AFUMY
AI.
AIYEW
AMPGV
ANUUZ
C08
C5K
CDERK
CITATION
DZZTS
HF~
JCBMY
LJTGL
UC2
V3N
VH1
C18
TASJS
8BJ
FQK
JBE
7QJ
7U4
BHHNA
DWI
WZK
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-21409a6fafe5524e91dc8dc372041758901efa2667bc7b817e04854adaf2bd7b3
ISSN 0950-2386
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 11:13:55 EDT 2025
Mon Aug 18 12:03:59 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 07 15:20:46 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 09:41:46 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:22 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:55:36 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 28 03:38:15 EDT 2024
Wed Dec 25 09:04:50 EST 2024
Mon May 13 12:09:09 EDT 2019
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3-4
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c541t-21409a6fafe5524e91dc8dc372041758901efa2667bc7b817e04854adaf2bd7b3
Notes Cultural Studies (London, England), v.17, nos 3-4, May-July 2003: (539)-552
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
PQID 1035772038
PQPubID 24074
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_38489330
crossref_primary_10_1080_0950238032000083935
proquest_miscellaneous_57211017
proquest_miscellaneous_60460665
proquest_miscellaneous_1035772038
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_0950238032000083935
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_0950238032000083935
rmit_apaft_https_data_informit_org_doi_10_3316_ielapa_200309031
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2003-05-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2003-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2003
  text: 2003-05-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationTitle Cultural studies (London, England)
PublicationYear 2003
Publisher Taylor & Francis Group
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis Group
References Kuhn Thomas (CIT0012) 1962
Bourdieu Pierre (CIT0005) 2000
Bourdieu Pierre (CIT0004) 1998
Bourdieu Pierre (CIT0008) 1999
Bourdieu Pierre (CIT0001) 1990
Bourdieu Pierre (CIT0007) 1992
Certeau Michel de (CIT0010) 1984
Bourdieu Pierre (CIT0003) 1993
Calhoun Craig (CIT0009) 1993
Certeau Michel de (CIT0011) 1998
Schirato Tony (CIT0013) 1997; 30
Bourdieu Pierre (CIT0002) 1990
Bourdieu Pierre (CIT0006) 1995
Shusterman Richard (CIT0014) 1999
References_xml – volume-title: Bourdieu:A Critical Reader
  year: 1999
  ident: CIT0014
– volume-title: Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology
  year: 1990
  ident: CIT0002
  doi: 10.1515/9781503621558
– volume-title: The Practice of Everyday. Life Volume Two: Living and Cooking
  year: 1998
  ident: CIT0011
– volume-title: Pascalian Meditations
  year: 2000
  ident: CIT0005
– volume: 30
  start-page: 259
  year: 1997
  ident: CIT0013
  publication-title: Southern Review
– volume-title: The Practice of Everyday Life
  year: 1984
  ident: CIT0010
– volume-title: The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society
  year: 1999
  ident: CIT0008
– volume-title: Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives
  year: 1993
  ident: CIT0009
– volume-title: The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature
  year: 1993
  ident: CIT0003
– volume-title: Practical Reason: on the Theory of Action
  year: 1998
  ident: CIT0004
– volume-title: An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology
  year: 1992
  ident: CIT0007
– volume-title: The Logic of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice
  year: 1990
  ident: CIT0001
– volume-title: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
  year: 1962
  ident: CIT0012
– volume-title: Free Exchange
  year: 1995
  ident: CIT0006
SSID ssj0004828
Score 1.770843
Snippet For Bourdieu, the extent to which agents can attain knowledge of, and negotiate, various cultural fields is dependent upon, and explicable in terms of, two...
For Bourdieu, the extent to which agents can attain knowledge of, & negotiate, various cultural fields is dependent upon, & explicable in terms of, two...
SourceID proquest
crossref
rmit
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 539
SubjectTerms Bourdieu, Pierre
Capital
Communication
Cultural studies
Culture
Habitus
Illusio
Knowledge
Knowledge (Theory)
Literacy
Pierre Bourdieu
Power (Philosophy)
Practical Knowledge
Reflexive Knowledge
Reflexivity
Scholastic Point Of View
Social Action
Social status
Sociological Theory
Sociology
The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society
Title BOURDIEU'S CONCEPT OF REFLEXIVITY AS METALITERACY
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0950238032000083935
https://search.informit.org/documentSummary;res=IELAPA;dn=200309031
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1035772038
https://www.proquest.com/docview/38489330
https://www.proquest.com/docview/57211017
https://www.proquest.com/docview/60460665
Volume 17
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bi9QwFA6y-yKC6Ko46y2C6INWJr2lfZJ1VQZBn2Zx8SXkKgtLKzsdcPz1npO0nda54OWlDJ0kbXMuOTk55zuEPJOgAZlOy8hlykQpT5KocKWOmGOGx8pNuYfY-PQ5n52lH8-z83UpOZ9d0qjX-ufWvJJ_oSrcA7piluxfULYfFG7Ab6AvXIHCcP0jGr-FRubCLr3TXYcERLT-YNVDnEtfFkIusEq0DKnGenSIe9qhbixCMOHW8h4DV8G8rlYI2-mP5vvQG1u9xGOdkftgEKzX-wGnEazb-Ugl8gHpuzScoOGygD3ULpZZgJ_d0MNt4CKMDUNjjXZv65UBmWSMev3batTHCKI_IfGehQt7CYaDx25FrxLsdQ9jYCHQZ4cns3dfv6zzYAtfS7f_pA5lCrHUN19lZImMcGpHu40BsIK3Oea3yM12s0BPAuVvk2u2OiI3BrUtVkfkuE85os9pSLamAftldYewjkNeLGjLH7R2dMAfVC7okD_ukrMP7-ens6gtkhHpLGVNFCNimcyddBaIkdqSGV0Y7YsPgWlYgL1nnQQzjCvNVcG4hWnKUmmki5XhKrlHDqq6svcJhTWzgN2wdGWqUlMWiqcGND6Y1MyanKkJibsJE7pFkMdCJpeCdUCzm7M8Ia_6Tt8DgMr-5vGQEqLxfisXisxs6yCaH82E8D2dkr2Pe9pRWoBexcMyWdl6uYAeScYxRqGYkCc72iQFQjcl090tMu9gYXx3ixwjE_Ic3uQNMpoATgd58qmBAoPERfgy-Ke--iZAvnD2UDBEEAvRi8Xxf4_wgFxfq4iH5KC5WtpHYHM36nErar8AQ33O1g
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED9B9wBC4mOA6PiYkRC8kG2O4zh5QqVK1Y5-oC5F3ZMVJzaaNrVopBLjr-fsNKOFtQ_w3Lu2ts93P9t3vwN4k6EHpHkQe4arwgsEY15k4tyjhhbCV-ZIOIqNwTDsToLjKZ-uVPHbtEp7hjYVUYTz1XZz28voOiXuEGGBDTW297fDEDHjt2GHxxgMG7CTjo-73d-1kZHrr2pVPNQJa-ahm79mLTqtcZeuIdCVYnsXhzoPIKtHUKWfnB8sSnWQ__yD3PF_hvgQ7i9BKmlVVvUIbunZLtxb6alwtQt716Uu5C2pinxJxTly9Rjox9FkjEhz8u6EtEfDdvI5JaMOGSedfjLtfemlp6R1QgZJ2uqj6xy32qdPYNJJ0nbXWzZn8HIe0NLzLVNWFprMaM79QMe0yKMid01vEJJEiDO0yTD8C5ULFVGhcSl4kBWZ8VUhFHsKjdl8pp8BQV-N59Q4M3GggiKOlAgK9DQI5aguQqqa4NeLIvMlc7ltoHEhaU1w-vdsNeH9tdK3irhju7i_utqydPclpmpucpOCLH-UTRBblNjWn3tdW5PE_WwfabKZni--owbjwr6NR03Y3yDDIksZxI42S3B3sKdis0RoX8TDEP_JB2vMEqEZejdno9ImJ8tqZPjJ_PKrRPu0s8cYDeWZvkBh27-U2Us-uvfPs7APd7rpoC_7veGn53DX5Um6XNIX0CgvF_ol4r1SvVpu6V--zkDG
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED9BJyGExMcA0fExIyF4IWOOkzh5QqUkakfXTl2KuicTJzZCTO20pRLjr-fsJKOFtQ_wnLskts_nn-273wG8ytAD0tyLHO3LwvE4Y06oo9yhmhbclXqfW4qNw2HQm3gHU39a1zm9qMMqzR5aV0QR1lebyX1W6CYi7h2iArPSmNLfFkJEzL8JW4HJGW3BVjo-6PV-p0aGtryqUXFQJ2iIh65_zcritEJdugJAl3Lt7TKU3IMvTQOq6JPve4tS7uU__-B2_I8W3oe7NUQlncqmHsANNduGO0sVFS63Yecq0YW8JlWKL6kYRy4fAv0wmowRZ07eHJPuaNiNj1IySsg4TgbxtP-5n56QzjE5jNPOAB3nuNM9eQSTJE67PacuzeDkvkdLxzU8WVmgM6183_VURIs8LHJb8gYBSYgoQ-kMF38ucy5DyhWOhO9lRaZdWXDJHkNrNp-pJ0DQU-MuNcp05EmviELJvQL9DAI5qoqAyja4zZiIvOYtN-UzTgVt6E3_7q02vL1SOqtoOzaLu8uDLUp7WqKr0ibXKYjyR9kGvkGJbfzcy8aYBM5mc0WTzdR8cYEazOfmZjxsw-4aGRYawiC2v17Ct9t6ytdLBOY-PAjwT94bWxYIzNC3WRMVJjRZVC3DJ_PzrwLN0_QeYzQQ39QpCpvqpcwc8dGdf-6FXbh19DERg_7w01O4bYMkbSDpM2iV5wv1HMFeKV_UE_oXeCM_ag
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bourdieu%27s+concept+of+reflexivity+as+metaliteracy&rft.jtitle=Cultural+studies+%28London%2C+England%29&rft.au=Tony+Schirato&rft.au=Jen+Webb&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.issn=0950-2386&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=539&rft.epage=552&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F0950238032000083935&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10.3316%2Fielapa.200309031
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0950-2386&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0950-2386&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0950-2386&client=summon