BOURDIEU'S CONCEPT OF REFLEXIVITY AS METALITERACY

For Bourdieu, the extent to which agents can attain knowledge of, and negotiate, various cultural fields is dependent upon, and explicable in terms of, two epistemological types. The first is a practical sense (the 'logic of practice'), while the second involves a sort of conscious compreh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCultural studies (London, England) Vol. 17; no. 3-4; pp. 539 - 553
Main Authors Schirato, Tony, Webb, Jen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis Group 01.05.2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0950-2386
1466-4348
DOI10.1080/0950238032000083935

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For Bourdieu, the extent to which agents can attain knowledge of, and negotiate, various cultural fields is dependent upon, and explicable in terms of, two epistemological types. The first is a practical sense (the 'logic of practice'), while the second involves a sort of conscious comprehension that he names 'reflexivity'. Bourdieu defines reflexivity as an interrogation of the three types of limitations (of social position, of field and of the scholastic point of view) that are constitutive of knowledge itself. But the reflexive relation to the habitus, the demands and influences exerted by cultural fields, and one's own practices within those fields, cannot be understood simply as something that is obtained by the subject; rather, any reflexive relation to the doxa and illusio of the field must be a constitutive part of that field. This paper identifies a number of principles taken from Bourdieu's work that clarify how, where and why the reflexive 'surpassing' of literacy might occur. But we also suggest, contra Bourdieu, that only fields that are informed or characterized by the scholastic point of view are likely to be characterized by the set of conditions constitutive of reflexive knowledge; and that the scholastic point of view is therefore, simultaneously, both a potential impediment to, and a condition (almost necessary) of the production of reflexive knowledge.
Bibliography:Cultural Studies (London, England), v.17, nos 3-4, May-July 2003: (539)-552
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0950-2386
1466-4348
DOI:10.1080/0950238032000083935