Large-Field Visual Motion Directly Induces an Involuntary Rapid Manual Following Response

• Published in: The Journal of neuroscience Vol. 25; no. 20; pp. 4941 - 4951
• Main Authors: Saijo, Naoki, Murakami, Ikuya, Nishida, Shin'ya, Gomi, Hiroaki
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Soc Neuroscience 18.05.2005; Society for Neuroscience
• Subjects: Adult; Arm - physiology; Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive; Bias; Biomechanical Phenomena; Electromyography - methods; Eye Movements - physiology; Functional Laterality - physiology; Hand Strength; Humans; Motion Perception - physiology; Movement - physiology; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Photic Stimulation - methods; Proprioception - physiology; Psychomotor Performance - physiology; Reaction Time - physiology; Space Perception - physiology; Time Factors; Visual Fields - physiology
• ISSN: 0270-6474; 1529-2401
• DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4143-04.2005

Recent neuroscience studies have been concerned with how aimed movements are generated on the basis of target localization. However, visual information from the surroundings as well as from the target can influence arm motor control, in a manner similar to known effects in postural and ocular motor control. Here, we show an ultra-fast manual motor response directly induced by a large-field visual motion. This rapid response aided reaction when the subject moved his hand in the direction of visual motion, suggesting assistive visually evoked manual control during postural movement. The latency of muscle activity generating this response was as short as that of the ocular following responses to the visual motion. Abrupt visual motion entrained arm movement without affecting perceptual target localization, and the degrees of motion coherence and speed of the visual stimulus modulated this arm response. This visuomotor behavior was still observed when the visual motion was confined to the "follow-through" phase of a hitting movement, in which no target existed. An analysis of the arm movements suggests that the hitting follow through made by the subject is not a part of a reaching movement. Moreover, the arm response was systematically modulated by hand bias forces, suggesting that it results from a reflexive control mechanism. We therefore propose that its mechanism is radically distinct from motor control for aimed movements to a target. Rather, in an analogy with reflexive eye movement stabilizing a retinal image, we consider that this mechanism regulates arm movements in parallel with voluntary motor control.