Dental implant in anterior mandible according to mandibular lingual foramens and lingual mucosal vessels: using fusion volumetric images from computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

• Published in: BMC oral health Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1 - 731
• Main Authors: Liu, Li, Li, Yijun, Shi, Yuchao, You, Meng, Wang, Jun, Sakamoto, Junichiro, Wang, Hu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 08.10.2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Airway management; Canine teeth; Computed tomography; Dental implants; Dental prosthetics; Evaluation; Hemorrhage; Imaging; Implant dentures; Incisors; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mandible; Mandibular; MRI; Mucosa; Neuroimaging; Patient outcomes; Patients; Premolars; Tomography; Veins & arteries; Japan; Germany
• ISSN: 1472-6831; 1472-6831
• DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03455-4

Abstract Background Perforation of the lingual cortex while placing dental implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible can cause severe hemorrhage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the features of mandibular lingual foraminals (MLFs) and locational relationship between them and lingual mucosal vessels (LMVs) by CT/MRI fusion volumetric images. Methods 37 images within complete anterior mandibular region using both MSCT and three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (3D-VIBE) MRI were taken from our imaging archives. After exclusion of 11 for lesions or artifacts, 26 CT/MRI fusion volumetric images were included to evaluate the frequency, diameter, and position of MLFs. The anterior mandibular region was divided into 4 equal segments under each teeth, and 40 regions were got from C5 to D5. Furthermore, the positional relationship between MLFs and LMVs was analyzed in this coordinate system. Results 62 MLFs (73.81%) were located below the incisors, followed by premolars (21.43%) and canines (4.76%). Female bias, the mean diameter of the female was 0.08 mm while the male was 0.21 mm. The total number of LMVs was most distributed on lingual side of C1 and D1. According to Spearman’s correlation coefficient, the location of MLFs was related to LMVs. The MLFs in fourth segment of D1 were positively moderately correlated with LMVs in fourth segment of D4, while the MLFs in third segment of C1 showed a weak positive correlation with LMVs in third segment of D4. Conclusions The features and the correlation between MLFs and LMVs in CT/MRI fusion volumetric images may offer reference to dentists when only MLFs can been seen on routine preoperative CT examination of implants. Trial registration Retrospectively registered. (D2018-072)