Ecological and genetic factors linked to contrasting genome dynamics in seed plants
CONTENTS: Summary 629 I. Introduction – overview 629 II. Genome structures 631 III. Factors that have shaped the genomes of angiosperms and gymnosperms 640 IV. The future of genomic studies in seed plants 643 Acknowledgements 643 References 643 SUMMARY: The large‐scale replacement of gymnosperms by...
Saved in:
Published in | The New phytologist Vol. 194; no. 3; pp. 629 - 646 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.05.2012
New Phytologist Trust Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | CONTENTS: Summary 629 I. Introduction – overview 629 II. Genome structures 631 III. Factors that have shaped the genomes of angiosperms and gymnosperms 640 IV. The future of genomic studies in seed plants 643 Acknowledgements 643 References 643 SUMMARY: The large‐scale replacement of gymnosperms by angiosperms in many ecological niches over time and the huge disparity in species numbers have led scientists to explore factors (e.g. polyploidy, developmental systems, floral evolution) that may have contributed to the astonishing rise of angiosperm diversity. Here, we explore genomic and ecological factors influencing seed plant genomes. This is timely given the recent surge in genomic data. We compare and contrast the genomic structure and evolution of angiosperms and gymnosperms and find that angiosperm genomes are more dynamic and diverse, particularly amongst the herbaceous species. Gymnosperms typically have reduced frequencies of a number of processes (e.g. polyploidy) that have shaped the genomes of other vascular plants and have alternative mechanisms to suppress genome dynamism (e.g. epigenetics and activity of transposable elements). Furthermore, the presence of several characters in angiosperms (e.g. herbaceous habit, short minimum generation time) has enabled them to exploit new niches and to be viable with small population sizes, where the power of genetic drift can outweigh that of selection. Together these processes have led to increased rates of genetic divergence and faster fixation times of variation in many angiosperms compared with gymnosperms. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04105.x ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0028-646X 1469-8137 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04105.x |