The Neandertal genome and ancient DNA authenticity

• Published in: The EMBO journal Vol. 28; no. 17; pp. 2494 - 2502
• Main Authors: Green, Richard E, Briggs, Adrian W, Krause, Johannes, Prüfer, Kay, Burbano, Hernán A, Siebauer, Michael, Lachmann, Michael, Pääbo, Svante
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 02.09.2009; Nature Publishing Group UK; Springer Nature B.V; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: ancient DNA; Animals; Authenticity; Base Sequence; Comparative studies; Contamination; Credibility; Deoxyribonucleic acid; DNA; DNA - chemistry; DNA contamination; DNA, Mitochondrial - chemistry; EMBO Member's Review; EMBO13; evolution; Evolution, Molecular; Fossils; Genetic Variation; Genome; Genomics; Hominidae - genetics; Hominids; Humans; Neandertal; Phylogeny; Sequence Analysis, DNA; genome; ancient DNA; evolution; Neandertal; DNA contamination
• ISSN: 0261-4189; 1460-2075
• DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2009.222

Recent advances in high‐thoughput DNA sequencing have made genome‐scale analyses of genomes of extinct organisms possible. With these new opportunities come new difficulties in assessing the authenticity of the DNA sequences retrieved. We discuss how these difficulties can be addressed, particularly with regard to analyses of the Neandertal genome. We argue that only direct assays of DNA sequence positions in which Neandertals differ from all contemporary humans can serve as a reliable means to estimate human contamination. Indirect measures, such as the extent of DNA fragmentation, nucleotide misincorporations, or comparison of derived allele frequencies in different fragment size classes, are unreliable. Fortunately, interim approaches based on mtDNA differences between Neandertals and current humans, detection of male contamination through Y chromosomal sequences, and repeated sequencing from the same fossil to detect autosomal contamination allow initial large‐scale sequencing of Neandertal genomes. This will result in the discovery of fixed differences in the nuclear genome between Neandertals and current humans that can serve as future direct assays for contamination. For analyses of other fossil hominins, which may become possible in the future, we suggest a similar ‘boot‐strap’ approach in which interim approaches are applied until sufficient data for more definitive direct assays are acquired.