Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1 - 611
• Main Authors: Huang, Shengjia, Min, Shaoxiong, Wang, Suwei, Jin, Anmin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 27.06.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Biomechanical; Biomechanics; Care and treatment; Cartilage; Cortical screw and rod; Degenerative disc disease; Diagnosis; Finite element analysis; Finite element method; Hernia; Internal fixation in fractures; Intervertebral discs; Intervertebral disk; Intervertebral disk displacement; Ligaments; Mathematical models; Methods; Minimally invasive surgery; Musculoskeletal diseases; Oblique lumbar interbody fusion; Patient outcomes; Posterior pedicle screw and rod; Risk factors; Software; Spinal fusion; Spine (lumbar); Surgery; Vertebrae; China; United States > US
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05553-w

Abstract Background Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is widely used to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical stability of OLIF, OLIF including posterior pedicle screw and rod (PSR), and OLIF including cortical screw and rod (CSR) instrumentation through finite element analysis. Methods A complete L2-L5 finite element model of the lumbar spine was constructed. Surgical models of OLIF, such as stand-alone, OLIF combined with PSR, and OLIF combined with CSR were created in the L3-L4 surgical segments. Range of motion (ROM), end plate stress, and internal fixation peak stress were compared between different models under the same loading conditions. Results Compared to the intact model, ROM was reduced in the OLIF model under all loading conditions. The surgical models in order of increasing ROM were PSR, CSR, and stand-alone; however, the difference in ROM between BPS and CSR was less than 0.4° and was not significant under any loading conditions. The stand-alone model had the highest stress on the superior L4 vertebral body endplate under all loading conditions, whereas the end plate stress was relatively low in the BPS and CSR models. The CSR model had the highest internal fixation stress, concentrated primarily at the end of the screw. Conclusions OLIF alone significantly reduces ROM but does not provide sufficient stability. Addition of posterior PSR or CSR internal fixation instrumentation to OLIF surgery can significantly improve biomechanical stability of the segment undergoing surgery.