A questionnaire to measure the quality of midwifery care in the postpartum period from women’s point of view: development and psychometric testing of MMAYpostpartum

• Published in: BMC pregnancy and childbirth Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 1 - 412
• Main Authors: Peters, Mirjam, Kolip, Petra, Schäfers, Rainhild
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 02.06.2021; BMC
• Subjects: Breastfeeding & lactation; Childbirth & labor; Consent; Data analysis; Gynecology; Midwifery; Midwifery care; Patient perspective; Patient satisfaction; Postpartum; Postpartum period; Pregnancy; Psychometrics; Quality of care; Quantitative psychology; Questionnaires; Sample size; Software; Womens health; Germany
• ISSN: 1471-2393; 1471-2393
• DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03857-8

Abstract Background Home postpartum care is a major part of midwifery care in Germany. The user perspective plays an increasingly important role in the evaluation of health services, but there is a lack of valid and theoretically based measuring instruments, especially in midwifery care. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an instrument for measuring quality of midwifery care in the postpartum period from the perspective of women. Methods The following steps were taken to achieve this: (1) definition of the goals of midwifery work; (2) literature-based item development; (3) item selection based on a pre-test ( n  = 16); (4) item reduction and investigation of factor structure by means of explorative factor analysis (EFA; n  = 133);(5) second EFA ( n  = 741) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n  = 744) based on a split representative sample survey; (6) hypothesis-based testing of correlations to sociodemographic characteristics of women and to characteristics of care. Results M easurement of M idwifery qu a lit y postpartum (MMAYpostpartum) consists of three scales with a total of 17 items which were found to have acceptable internal consistency: Personal Control (Cronbach’s alpha = .80), Trusting Relationship (Cronbach’s alpha = .87) and Orientation and Security (Cronbach’s alpha = .78). CFA verified and confirmed three factors: CFI = .928, TLI = .914, RMSEA = 0.073. Conclusion MMAYpostpartum is a predominantly valid, reliable short tool for evaluating the quality of midwifery care postpartum. It can be used to evaluate midwifery care, to compare different care models and in intervention research. It thus supports the orientation of midwives’ work towards the needs of women and their families.