Preparing tomorrow’s medical specialists for participating in oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: perceived barriers, facilitators and training needs

• Published in: BMC medical education Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 1 - 502
• Main Authors: Walraven, Janneke E. W, van der Meulen, Renske, van der Hoeven, Jacobus J. M, Lemmens, Valery E. P. P, Verhoeven, Rob H. A, Hesselink, Gijs, Desar, Ingrid M. E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 27.06.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Cancer; Care and treatment; Clinical learning environment; Codes; Collaboration; Communication; Conferences, meetings and seminars; Consent; Data analysis; Education; Educational Environment; Educational Needs; Evaluation; Health care teams; Hospitals; Interviews; Medical education; Medical research; Medical residents; Medicine; Meetings; Multidisciplinary team meeting; Multidisciplinary teams; Participation; Practice; Qualitative research; Radiation; Researchers; Residents (Medicine); Role models; School environment; Software; Specialties and specialists; Teaching Methods; Training; Netherlands
• ISSN: 1472-6920; 1472-6920
• DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03570-w

Abstract Introduction The optimal treatment plan for patients with cancer is discussed in multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs). Effective meetings require all participants to have collaboration and communication competences. Participating residents (defined as qualified doctors in training to become a specialist) are expected to develop these competences by observing their supervisors. However, the current generation of medical specialists is not trained to work in multidisciplinary teams; currently, training mainly focuses on medical competences. This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators among residents with respect to learning how to participate competently in MDTMs, and to identify additional training needs regarding their future role in MDTMs, as perceived by residents and specialists. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with Dutch residents and medical specialists participating in oncological MDTMs. Purposive sampling was used to maximise variation in participants’ demographic and professional characteristics (e.g. sex, specialty, training duration, type and location of affiliated hospital). Interview data were systematically analysed according to the principles of thematic content analysis. Results Nineteen residents and 16 specialists were interviewed. Three themes emerged: 1) awareness of the educational function of MDTMs among specialists and residents; 2) characteristics of MDTMs (e.g. time constraints, MDTM regulations) and 3) team dynamics and behaviour. Learning to participate in MDTMs is facilitated by: specialists and residents acknowledging the educational function of MDTMs beyond their medical content, and supervisors fulfilling their teaching role and setting conditions that enable residents to take a participative role (e.g. being well prepared, sitting in the inner circle, having assigned responsibilities). Barriers to residents’ MDTM participation were insufficient guidance by their supervisors, time constraints, regulations hindering their active participation, a hierarchical structure of relations, unfamiliarity with the team and personal characteristics of residents (e.g. lack of confidence and shyness). Interviewees indicated a need for additional training (e.g. simulations) for residents, especially to enhance behavioural and communication skills. Conclusion Current practice with regard to preparing residents for their future role in MDTMs is hampered by a variety of factors. Most importantly, more awareness of the educational purposes of MDTMs among both residents and medical specialists would allow residents to participate in and learn from oncological MDTMs. Future studies should focus on collaboration competences.