Portable biosensor for monitoring cortisol in low-volume perspired human sweat

A non-faradaic label-free cortisol biosensor was demonstrated using MoS 2 nanosheets integrated into a nanoporous flexible electrode system. Low volume (1–5 μL) sensing was achieved through use of a novel sensor stack design comprised of vertically aligned metal electrodes confining semi-conductive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 13312 - 13
Main Authors Kinnamon, David, Ghanta, Ramesh, Lin, Kai-Chun, Muthukumar, Sriram, Prasad, Shalini
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 17.10.2017
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A non-faradaic label-free cortisol biosensor was demonstrated using MoS 2 nanosheets integrated into a nanoporous flexible electrode system. Low volume (1–5 μL) sensing was achieved through use of a novel sensor stack design comprised of vertically aligned metal electrodes confining semi-conductive MoS 2 nanosheets. The MoS 2 nanosheets were surface functionalized with cortisol antibodies towards developing an affinity biosensor specific to the physiological relevant range of cortisol (8.16 to 141.7 ng/mL) in perspired human sweat. Sensing was achieved by measuring impedance changes associated with cortisol binding along the MoS 2 nanosheet interface using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The sensor demonstrated a dynamic range from 1–500 ng/mL with a limit of detection of 1 ng/mL. A specificity study was conducted using a metabolite expressed in human sweat, Ethyl Glucuronide. Continuous dosing studies were performed during which the sensor was able to discriminate between four cortisol concentration ranges (0.5, 5, 50, 500 ng/mL) for a 3+ hour duration. Translatability of the sensor was shown with a portable form factor device, demonstrating a comparable dynamic range and limit of detection for the sensor. The device demonstrated a R 2 correlation value of 0.998 when comparing measurements to the reported impedance values of the benchtop instrumentation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-13684-7