Insecticide-treated eave ribbons for malaria vector control in low-income communities

• Published in: Malaria journal Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 1 - 415
• Main Authors: Kaindoa, Emmanuel W, Mmbando, Arnold S, Shirima, Ruth, Hape, Emmanuel E, Okumu, Fredros O
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 23.10.2021; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Aquatic insects; Biting; Community; Control; Control methods; Culicidae; Demographic aspects; Design; Developing countries; Disease transmission; Eave ribbons; Health aspects; Households; Houses; Human diseases; Indoor residual spraying; Insecticides; Low income areas; Low income groups; Malaria; Mortality; Mosquitoes; Outdoors; Prevention; Repellents; Review; Spatial repellents; Technology; Vector-borne diseases; Vectors; Tanzania
• ISSN: 1475-2875; 1475-2875
• DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03945-2

Supplementary tools are required to address the limitations of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), which are currently the core vector control methods against malaria in Africa. The eave ribbons technology exploits the natural house-entry behaviours of major malaria vectors to deliver mosquitocidal or repellent actives around eave spaces through which the Anopheles mosquitoes usually enter human dwellings. They confer protection by preventing biting indoors and in the peri-domestic outdoor spaces, and also killing a significant proportion of the mosquitoes. Current versions of eave ribbons are made of low-cost hessian fabric infused with candidate insecticides and can be easily fitted onto multiple house types without any additional modifications. This article reviews the evidence for efficacy of the technology, and discusses its potential as affordable and versatile supplementary approach for targeted and efficient control of mosquito-borne diseases, particularly malaria. Given their simplicity and demonstrated potential in previous studies, future research should investigate ways to optimize scalability and effectiveness of the ribbons. It is also important to assess whether the ribbons may constitute a less-cumbersome, but more affordable substitute for other interventions, such as IRS, by judiciously using lower quantities of selected insecticides targeted around eave spaces to deliver equivalent or greater suppression of malaria transmission.