Infectious keratitis after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus caused by levofloxacin-resistant microorganisms
Abstract Introduction We present seven cases of infectious keratitis after corneal crosslinking (CXL) to attenuate keratoconus progression. Methods Of 524 consecutive patients who underwent CXL, 7 cases (4 males and 3 females; 21.5 ± 7.1 years) developed postoperative infectious keratitis were retro...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC ophthalmology Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 1 - 317 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central Ltd
31.08.2021
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract
Introduction
We present seven cases of infectious keratitis after corneal crosslinking (CXL) to attenuate keratoconus progression.
Methods
Of 524 consecutive patients who underwent CXL, 7 cases (4 males and 3 females; 21.5 ± 7.1 years) developed postoperative infectious keratitis were retrospectively reviewed. CXL was performed using the Dresden protocol or an accelerated protocol involving epithelial removal.
Results
All cases appeared normal on the day after surgery, but subsequently developed eye pain, blurred vision, corneal infiltration, inflammation of the anterior chamber, and ciliary injection on day 2 or 3. Methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus
was cultured from two eyes, methicillin-sensitive
Staphylococcus aureus
from two eyes, and
Streptococcus pneumoniae
from one eye. All detected bacteria were resistant to levofloxacin (LVFX). Five of the seven cases, especially four of the five severe cases with hypopyon, had a history of atopic dermatitis. All cases were observed after 2015.
Conclusions
Infectious keratitis after CXL caused by microbes resistant to LVFX is increasing. In addition to careful postoperative observation of the cornea, preoperative evaluation of bacteria within the conjunctival sac evident on nasal swab cultures may be useful to identify potentially problematic microbes and inform the selection of appropriate antibiotics. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1471-2415 1471-2415 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12886-021-02081-4 |