Impact of barometric pressure on adhesive small bowel obstruction: a retrospective study

• Published in: BMC surgery Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 1 - 168
• Main Authors: Yamamoto, Yuta, Miyagawa, Yusuke, Kitazawa, Masato, Tanaka, Hirokazu, Kuroiwa, Masatsugu, Hondo, Nao, Koyama, Makoto, Nakamura, Satoshi, Tokumaru, Shigeo, Muranaka, Futoshi, Soejima, Yuji
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 25.07.2020; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Abdomen; Abdominal surgery; Adhesive small bowel obstruction; Atmospheric pressure; Barometric pressure; Care and treatment; Comparative analysis; Decompression; Fasting; Fluctuations; Gastrointestinal diseases; Intestinal obstruction; Ischemia; Laws, regulations and rules; Morbidity; Pressure; Reciprocal fluctuation; Small intestine; Statistical analysis; Surgery; Japan
• ISSN: 1471-2482; 1471-2482
• DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00829-1

Abstract Background Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is one of the most common causes of postoperative morbidity. According to Boyle’s law, decreased barometric pressure expands the volume of intestinal gas. We aimed to elucidate the relationship between barometric pressure and ASBO. Methods We divided 215 admissions of 120 patients with ASBO into three groups: the fasting group, which responded to fasting ( n  = 51); the decompression group, which was successfully treated with gastrointestinal decompression ( n  = 104); and the surgery group which required emergency or elective surgery to treat ASBO ( n  = 60). We compared and examined clinical backgrounds, findings on admission, and barometric pressure during the peri-onset period (29 days: from 14 days before to 14 days after the onset of ASBO). Results There were significant differences among the three groups regarding gender, history of ASBO, hospital length of stay, and barometric pressure on the onset day of ASBO. Barometric pressure on the onset day was significantly higher in the fasting group than in the decompression group ( p  = 0.005). During pre-onset day 5 to post-onset day 2, fluctuations in the barometric pressure in the fasting and decompression groups showed reciprocal changes with a symmetrical axis overlapping the median barometric pressure in Matsumoto City; the fluctuations tapered over time after onset. In the fasting group, the barometric pressure on the onset day was significantly higher than that on pre-onset days 14, 11, 7, 4, 3, and 2; post-onset days 3 and 10; and the median pressure in Matsumoto City. Conversely, in the decompression group, the barometric pressure on the onset day was lower than that on pre-onset days 14, 5–2; post-onset days 1, 2, 7, 8, 11, 13, and 14; and the median pressure in Matsumoto City. In the surgery group, the barometric pressure on the onset day was equivalent to those on the other days. Conclusions ASBO with response to conservative treatment is vulnerable to barometric pressure. Additionally, ASBO that is successfully treated with fasting and decompression is associated with a different barometric pressure on the onset day and reciprocal fluctuations in the barometric pressure during the peri-onset period.