Experimentally induced helper dispersal in colonially breeding cooperative cichlids

• Published in: Environmental biology of fishes Vol. 83; no. 2; pp. 191 - 206
• Main Authors: Heg, D, Heg-Bachar, Z, Brouwer, L, Taborsky, M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands 01.10.2008; Springer Netherlands; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Agnatha. Pisces; Allee effects; Animal and plant ecology; Animal reproduction; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Animals; Autoecology; Biological and medical sciences; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Cichlidae; Cooperative breeding; Dispersal; Environment; Fish; Freshwater; Freshwater & Marine Ecology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Habitat saturation; Habitats; Life Sciences; Marine biology; Nature Conservation; Neolamprologus pulcher; Neolamprologus savoryi; Predators; Studies; Vertebrata; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution; Zoology; Zambia, Tanganyika L; Cichlidae; Allee effects; Cooperative breeding; Habitat saturation; Dispersal; Allee effect; Breeding behavior; Dispersion; Non breeding adult; Social status; Vertebrata; Social interaction; Pisces; Population dynamics; Habitat; Mating status; Population density
• ISSN: 0378-1909; 1573-5133
• DOI: 10.1007/s10641-007-9317-3

The 'benefits of philopatry' hypothesis states that helpers in cooperatively breeding species derive higher benefits from remaining home, instead of dispersing and attempting to breed independently. We tested experimentally whether dispersal options influence dispersal propensity in the cooperatively breeding Lake Tanganyika cichlids Neolamprologus pulcher and N. savoryi. Cooperative groups of these fishes breed in densely packed colonies, surrounded by unoccupied, but apparently suitable breeding habitat. Breeding inside colonies and living in groups seems to benefit individuals, for example by early detection and deterrence of predators. We show that despite a slight preference of both species for habitat with a higher stone cover, 40% of the preferred habitat remained unoccupied. On average, the colonies contained a higher number of (1) predators of adults, juveniles and eggs, (2) shelter competitors, and (3) other species including potential food competitors, compared to the outside colony habitat. Apparently, habitat differences cannot explain why these cichlids breed in colonies. Accordingly, dispersal may not be limited by a lack of suitable breeding shelters, but by the relatively higher risk of establishing an outside- compared to a within-colony breeding territory. To test whether cichlids prefer within- to outside-colony breeding territories, we provided breeding shelters inside the colony and at the colony edge and studied helper dispersal. As expected, significantly more shelters were occupied within the colony compared to the edge. New breeding pairs with several helpers occupied these shelters. We conclude that although breeding habitat is plentiful outside the colonies, helpers delay dispersal to obtain a higher quality breeding position within the group or colony eventually, or they disperse in groups. Our results suggest that (1) group augmentation and Allee effects are generally important for dispersal decisions in cooperatively breeding cichlids, consistent with the 'benefits of philopatry hypothesis', and (2) habitat saturation cannot fully explain delayed dispersal in these species.