Appraising clinical applicability of studies: mapping and synthesis of current frameworks, and proposal of the FrACAS framework and VICORT checklist

• Published in: BMC medical research methodology Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 1 - 248
• Main Authors: Nguyen, Quoc Dinh, Moodie, Erica M, Desmarais, Philippe, Goulden, Robert, Forget, Marie-France, Peters, Eric, Saeed, Sahar, Keezer, Mark R, Wolfson, Christina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 14.11.2021; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Bias; Clinical medicine; Clinical trials; Decision making; Epidemiology; Evidence-based medicine; Evidence-based practice; External validity; Generalizability; Impact; Intervention; Management; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Meetings; Methods; Public health; Quality assessment; Research methodology; Validity; Canada
• ISSN: 1471-2288; 1471-2288
• DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01445-0

Abstract Background Not all research findings are translated to clinical practice. Reasons for lack of applicability are varied, and multiple frameworks and criteria exist to appraise the general applicability of epidemiological and clinical research. In this two-part study, we identify, map, and synthesize frameworks and criteria; we develop a framework to assist clinicians to appraise applicability specifically from a clinical perspective. Methods We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase to identify frameworks appraising applicability of study results. Conceptual thematic analysis was used to synthesize frameworks and criteria. We carried out a framework development process integrating contemporary debates in epidemiology, findings from the literature search and synthesis, iterative pilot-testing, and brainstorming and consensus discussions to propose a concise framework to appraise clinical applicability. Results Of the 4622 references retrieved, we identified 26 unique frameworks featuring 21 criteria. Frameworks and criteria varied by scope and level of aggregation of the evidence appraised, target user, and specific area of applicability (internal validity, clinical applicability, external validity, and system applicability). Our proposed Framework Appraising the Clinical Applicability of Studies (FrACAS) classifies studies in three domains (research, practice informing, and practice changing) by examining six criteria sequentially: Validity, Indication-informativeness, Clinical relevance, Originality, Risk-benefit comprehensiveness, and Transposability (VICORT checklist). Conclusions Existing frameworks to applicability vary by scope, target user, and area of applicability. We introduce FrACAS to specifically assess applicability from a clinical perspective. Our framework can be used as a tool for the design, appraisal, and interpretation of epidemiological and clinical studies.