Epidemiology of revision hip replacement in Italy: a 15-year study

• Published in: BMC surgery Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 1 - 355
• Main Authors: Longo, Umile Giuseppe, Papalia, Rocco, Salvatore, Giuseppe, Tecce, Salvatore Maria, Jedrzejczak, Alexander, Marcozzi, Martina, Piergentili, Ilaria, Denaro, Vincenzo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 04.10.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Age; Arthroplasty; Biomedical materials; Complications; Epidemiology; Females; Health aspects; Hip; Hospital costs; Hospitalization; Implants, Artificial; Incidence; Inflammation; Italy; Joint replacement surgery; Joints (anatomy); Males; Orthopedic apparatus; Orthopedics; Patients; Population studies; Prevalence; Prostheses; Prosthesis; Revision hip replacement; Revisions; Risk analysis; Risk factors; Surgery; Trends; Sweden; United Kingdom > UK; Italy
• ISSN: 1471-2482; 1471-2482
• DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01785-8

Abstract Background Over the past two decades, there has been an increase in the amount of primary total hip arthroscopies (THA) which in turn has increased the need for THA revision surgeries. The purpose of this study was to quantify the increase in THA revision in Italy, evaluate the causes and types of THA procedures performed. Methods The data regarding revision hip prosthetic replacements performed both in public and private structures between 2001 and 2015 was collected by the National Hospital Discharge reports (SDO) carried out by the Italian Ministry of Health. Results Overall, 109,746 Revision Hip Replacements (RHR) were performed in Italy from 2001 to 2015 in the adult population. The study shows a greater number of female patients underwent surgery between 2001 and 2015 and the 75- to 79-year age group had the highest incidence of THA revision. The main causes for THA revision were found to be “Mechanical complication of internal orthopedic device implant and graft” (31.5%), “Infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal joint prosthesis” (10.5%) and “Mechanical loosening of prosthetic joint” (8.3%). Conclusions Revision hip replacement is growing and heavily affecting the population between 65 and 89 years and the main causes of THA revision have been quantified. The average length of hospitalization (LOS) was found to have decreased over the 14-year study period. Understanding the causes and risk factors for revision is essential in identifying avoidable complications and improving preventative care for patients undergoing primary implantation to decrease the revision burden.