Chronotype: what role in the context of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors?

• Published in: Journal of translational medicine Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 1 - 13
• Main Authors: Barrea, Luigi, Muscogiuri, Giovanna, Pugliese, Gabriella, Modica, Roberta, Laudisio, Daniela, Aprano, Sara, Faggiano, Antongiulio, Colao, Annamaria, Savastano, Silvia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 30.07.2021; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Chronotype; Circadian rhythm; Circadian rhythms; Diet; Endometrial cancer; Gastroenteropancreatic tumors (GEP-NET); Gastrointestinal tumors; Health aspects; Metabolic syndrome (MetS); Metastases; Neuroendocrine tumors; Nutrition; Ovarian cancer; Patients; Risk factors; Sleep-wake cycle; Tumor aggressiveness; Italy
• ISSN: 1479-5876; 1479-5876
• DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-03010-1

Background Chronotype is defined as a trait determining the subject circadian preference in behavioral and biological rhythms relative to external light-dark cycle. Although individual differences in chronotype have been associated with an increased risk of developing some types of cancer, no studies have been carried out in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET). Materials We investigate the differences in chronotype between 109 GEP-NET and 109 healthy subjects, gender-, age-, and BMI-matched; and its correlation with tumor aggressiveness. Results GEP-NET patients have a lower chronotype score (p = 0.035) and a higher percentage of evening chronotype (p = 0.003) than controls. GEP-NET patients with morning chronotype had lower BMI, waist circumference, and higher percentage of MetS (p < 0.001) than evening type. Interestingly, considering the clinical pathological characteristics, patients with the presence of metastasis, grading G2, and in progressive disease presented the lower chronotype score (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, and p = 0.002; respectively) compared to other categories. Chronotype score was negatively associated with anthropometric measurements, metabolic profile, percentage of MetS, and Ki67 index (p < 0.001 for all). Conclusions GEP-NET patients have an unhealthy metabolic profile and present more commonly an evening chronotype. These results support the importance of including the assessment of chronotype in an adjunctive tool for the prevention of metabolic alterations and tumor aggressiveness of GEP-NET. Keywords: Chronotype, Gastroenteropancreatic tumors (GEP-NET), Metabolic syndrome (MetS), Tumor aggressiveness, Diet, Nutrition, Nutritionist