Comparison of Fecal Microbial Composition and Antibiotic Resistance Genes from Swine, Farm Workers and the Surrounding Villagers

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 4965 - 7
• Main Authors: Sun, Jian, Huang, Ting, Chen, Chong, Cao, Ting-Ting, Cheng, Ke, Liao, Xiao-Ping, Liu, Ya-Hong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 10.07.2017; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/326/22/1434; 631/326/2565/2134; Abundance; Antibiotic resistance; Antibiotics; Farms; Farmworkers; Fecal microflora; Feces; Health risks; Humanities and Social Sciences; Intestinal microflora; multidisciplinary; Relative abundance; rRNA 16S; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Species diversity; Swine; Workers
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04672-y

The external environment plays a critical role in shaping the structure of the gut microbiome. One potential health threat lies in the release of antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) from cross-contaminated microbiomes. We focused this study on a comparison of fecal microbial composition and antibiotic resistant genes between farm workers, local villagers and swine. We used a high-throughput next-generation sequencing of 16S rRNA and real-time PCR for these studies. Our results indicated that workers had less species diversity as compared to the local villagers. Moreover, the bacterial communities of the farm workers, the local villagers and swine feces were clearly divided into three groups. The workers had a greater abundance of Proteobacteria as compared to swine and the local villagers. The Clostridiaceae in the workers and swine were more abundant than the local villagers. In addition, there were ARG differences between the farm workers or local villager’s and swine feces. The farm workers and the local villagers had similar relative abundance except for macrolide ARGs. Taken together, these data suggest that the swine farm environment affects the fecal bacterial composition of swine farm workers. However, ARG spread was influenced by factors independent of the swine farm environment.