The significance of pre-therapeutic F-18-FDG PET–CT in lymphoma-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis when pathological evidence is unavailable
Purpose The significance of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET–CT) in identifying patients with lymphoma-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (LAHLH) when pathological evidence is unavailable remains uncertain. Methods In this retrospective study, 44 HLH patients who unde...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology Vol. 142; no. 4; pp. 859 - 871 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.04.2016
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose
The significance of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET–CT) in identifying patients with lymphoma-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (LAHLH) when pathological evidence is unavailable remains uncertain.
Methods
In this retrospective study, 44 HLH patients who underwent PET–CT before clinical treatment were enrolled, and 18 of them were highly suspected as LAHLH by PET–CT. We compared the PET–CT parameters between confirmed LAHLH and non-LAHLH patients. The efficacy of initial therapies for highly suspected LAHLH patients was analyzed as well.
Results
We found that the SUV
Sp
, SUV
BM
, SUV
LN
, SUV
max
, SUV
LN/Li
, and SUV
max/Li
in LAHLH group were significantly higher than those in non-LAHLH group (
p
= 0.003,
p
= 0.034,
p
= 0.003,
p
< 0.001,
p
= 0.039, and
p
= 0.035, respectively). HLH patients with an SUV
max
value >5.5, an SUV
LN
value >3.3, and an SUV
Sp
value >4.8 were more likely to be LAHLH (
p
< 0.001,
p
= 0.003, and
p
= 0.003, respectively). And the incidence of multiple lymphadenopathy with increased FDG uptake or the incidence of multiple bone lesions in LAHLH patients was significantly higher than those in non-LAHLH group (92.9 vs. 35.7 %,
p
= 0.004; 42.9 vs. 0 %,
p
= 0.016, respectively). Furthermore, by comparing the efficacy of initial therapies for highly suspected LAHLH patients (
n
= 18), we indicated that the CR rate was significantly higher in lymphoma-chemotherapy group than in immunosuppressive therapy group (90 and 25 %, respectively;
p
= 0.013). OS analysis revealed that highly suspected LAHLH patients treated with lymphoma-chemotherapy had better prognosis (264 days) than those treated with immunosuppressive therapy (15 days) (
p
< 0.0001).
Conclusions
When pathological evidence is absent, PET–CT may play an important role in identifying HLH patients underlying lymphoma. Once highly suspected as LAHLH by PET–CT, lymphoma-chemotherapies that directly treat the underling lymphoma may have a relatively favorable effect and better clinical outcomes than immunosuppressive therapy. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0171-5216 1432-1335 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00432-015-2094-z |