Hurdles to developing and scaling remote patients’ health management tools and systems: a scoping review

• Published in: Systematic reviews Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 1 - 179
• Main Authors: Ruyobeza, Barimwotubiri, Grobbelaar, Sara S., Botha, Adele
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 30.08.2022; BMC
• Subjects: Accessibility; Adoption and scalability; Cost analysis; Cost control; Design; Design framework; Designers; Developing countries; Health facilities; Infrastructure; Integration; LDCs; Patients; Planning; Remote patient management; Technology adoption; Versatility
• ISSN: 2046-4053; 2046-4053
• DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02033-z

Abstract Background Despite all the excitement and hype generated regarding the expected transformative impact of digital technology on the healthcare industry, traditional healthcare systems around the world have largely remained unchanged and resultant improvements in developed countries are slower than anticipated. One area which was expected to significantly improve the quality of and access to primary healthcare services in particular is remote patient monitoring and management. Based on a combination of rapid advances in body sensors and information and communication technologies (ICT), it was hoped that remote patient management tools and systems (RPMTSs) would significantly reduce the care burden on traditional healthcare systems as well as health-related costs. However, the uptake or adoption of above systems has been extremely slow and their roll out has not yet properly taken off especially in developing countries where they ought to have made the greatest positive impact. Aim The aim of the study was to assess whether or not recent , relevant literature would support the development of in-community, design, deployment and implementation framework based on three factors thought to be important drivers and levers of RPMTS’s adoption and scalability . Methods A rapid, scoping review conducted on relevant articles obtained from PubMed, MEDLINE, PMC and Cochrane databases and grey literature on Google and published between 2012 and May 2020, by combining a number of relevant search terms and phrases. Results Most RPMTSs are targeted at and focused on a single disease, do not extensively involve patients and clinicians in their early planning and design phases, are not designed to best serve a specific catchment area and are mainly directed at post-hospital, disease management settings. This may be leading to a situation where patients, potential patients and clinicians simply do not make use of these tools, leading to low adoption and scalability thereof. Conclusion The development of a user-centred, context-dependent, customizable design and deployment framework could potentially increase the adoption and scalability of RPMTSs, if such framework addressed a combination of diseases, prevalent in a given specific catchment area, especially in developing countries with limited financial resources.