The effect of My Health Record use in the emergency department on clinician-assessed patient care: results from a survey

• Published in: BMC medical informatics and decision making Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 1 - 178
• Main Authors: Mullins, Alexandra, O'Donnell, Renee, Morris, Heather, Ben-Meir, Michael, Hatzikiriakidis, Kostas, Brichko, Lisa, Skouteris, Helen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 05.07.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Ambulatory care; Confidence intervals; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Drug stores; Electronic health record; Electronic health records; Electronic medical records; Electronic records; Emergency department; Emergency medical care; Emergency medical services; Emergency service; Health informatics; Hospitals; Medical personnel; Medical record personnel; Medical records; Medical systems; Meetings; My Health Record; Pandemics; Patients; Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record; Response rates; Surveys; Australia
• ISSN: 1472-6947; 1472-6947
• DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-01920-8

Abstract Background The emergency department has been a major focus for the implementation of Australia’s national electronic health record, known as My Health Record. However, the association between use of My Health Record in the emergency department setting and patient care is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of emergency department clinicians regarding My Health Record use frequency, the benefits of My Health Record use (with a focus on patient care) and the barriers to use. Methods All 393 nursing, pharmacy, physician and allied health staff employed within the emergency department at a tertiary metropolitan public hospital in Melbourne were invited to participate in a web-based survey, between 1 May 2021 and 1 December 2021, during the height of the Delta and Omicron Covid-19 outbreaks in Victoria, Australia. Results Overall, the survey response rate was 18% (70/393). Approximately half of the sample indicated My Health Record use in the emergency department (n = 39, 56%, confidence interval [CI] 43–68%). The results showed that users typically only engaged with My Health Record less than once per shift (n = 15, 39%, CI 23–55%). Just over half (n = 19/39, 54%, CI 32–65%) of all participants who use My Health Record agreed they could remember a time when My Health Record had been critical to the care of a patient. Overall, clinicians indicated the biggest barrier preventing their use of My Health Record is that they forget to utilise the system. Conclusion The results suggest that My Health Record has not been adopted as routine practice in the emergency department, by the majority of participants. Close to half of self-identified users of My Health Record do not associate use as being critical to patient care. Instead, My Health Record may only be used in scenarios that clinicians perceive will yield the greatest benefit—which clinicians in this paper suggest is patients with chronic and complex conditions. Further research that explores the predictors to use and consumers most likely to benefit from use is recommended—and strategies to socialise this knowledge and educate clinicians is desperately required.