CRM literature: conceptual and functional insights by keyword analysis

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on customer relationship management (CRM) to obtain a comprehensive framework of mutually exclusive CRM research areas and sub-areas free of all potentially disruptive factors (plethora of CRM definitions, personal judgments, etc.).Desi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMarketing intelligence & planning Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 48 - 85
Main Authors Kevork, Eleni K, Vrechopoulos, Adam P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bradford Emerald Group Publishing Limited 01.01.2009
Emerald
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on customer relationship management (CRM) to obtain a comprehensive framework of mutually exclusive CRM research areas and sub-areas free of all potentially disruptive factors (plethora of CRM definitions, personal judgments, etc.).Design methodology approach - The keywords reported in 396 CRM articles published during the period 2000-2006 are used to uncover first a great number of detailed keyword sub-groups and, by subject summation, the CRM-related research areas. This classification scheme is considered unbiased, in contrast with any direct classification of articles alone among CRM research areas fixed in advance.Findings - An up-to-date conceptual and functional CRM framework emerges, consisting of a total of nine distinct research areas having their own weights, importance and popularity among the research community. Newly emerging CRM research areas are self-identified as attracting the interest of the researchers and managers.Originality value - Keywords are activated, for a first time, as an added value characteristic reflecting genuinely the authors' beliefs about the subject content fields of their articles, important enough to reveal a self-supported and self-weighted unbiased and exhaustive CRM framework, useful to researchers and marketing practitioners. The paper offers strong evidence that e-CRM is too complex to be comprehensively classified by mere procedures and simple criteria alone.
Bibliography:href:02634500910928362.pdf
ark:/67375/4W2-BFCXS82J-L
istex:BA828B017A5251DE43058C70890CE0D0A4DF3111
filenameID:0200270103
original-pdf:0200270103.pdf
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Literature Review-2
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0263-4503
1758-8049
DOI:10.1108/02634500910928362