CRM literature: conceptual and functional insights by keyword analysis
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on customer relationship management (CRM) to obtain a comprehensive framework of mutually exclusive CRM research areas and sub-areas free of all potentially disruptive factors (plethora of CRM definitions, personal judgments, etc.).Desi...
Saved in:
Published in | Marketing intelligence & planning Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 48 - 85 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bradford
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
01.01.2009
Emerald |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on customer relationship management (CRM) to obtain a comprehensive framework of mutually exclusive CRM research areas and sub-areas free of all potentially disruptive factors (plethora of CRM definitions, personal judgments, etc.).Design methodology approach - The keywords reported in 396 CRM articles published during the period 2000-2006 are used to uncover first a great number of detailed keyword sub-groups and, by subject summation, the CRM-related research areas. This classification scheme is considered unbiased, in contrast with any direct classification of articles alone among CRM research areas fixed in advance.Findings - An up-to-date conceptual and functional CRM framework emerges, consisting of a total of nine distinct research areas having their own weights, importance and popularity among the research community. Newly emerging CRM research areas are self-identified as attracting the interest of the researchers and managers.Originality value - Keywords are activated, for a first time, as an added value characteristic reflecting genuinely the authors' beliefs about the subject content fields of their articles, important enough to reveal a self-supported and self-weighted unbiased and exhaustive CRM framework, useful to researchers and marketing practitioners. The paper offers strong evidence that e-CRM is too complex to be comprehensively classified by mere procedures and simple criteria alone. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | href:02634500910928362.pdf ark:/67375/4W2-BFCXS82J-L istex:BA828B017A5251DE43058C70890CE0D0A4DF3111 filenameID:0200270103 original-pdf:0200270103.pdf ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Literature Review-2 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0263-4503 1758-8049 |
DOI: | 10.1108/02634500910928362 |