Integrating Biomonitoring Exposure Data into the Risk Assessment Process: Phthalates [Diethyl Phthalate and Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate] as a Case Study

• Published in: Environmental health perspectives Vol. 114; no. 11; pp. 1783 - 1789
• Main Authors: Calafat, Antonia M., McKee, Richard H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare 01.11.2006; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
• Subjects: Animals; Biomarkers - urine; Chemical hazards; Diethylhexyl Phthalate - analysis; Diethylhexyl Phthalate - toxicity; Dosage; Environmental Health; Environmental Monitoring; Environmental Pollutants - analysis; Environmental Pollutants - toxicity; Ethers; Flame retardants; Halogenated diphenyl ethers; Humans; Liver; Mini-Monograph; Patent foramen ovale; Phthalic Acids - analysis; Phthalic Acids - toxicity; Rats; Risk Assessment; Toxicology
• ISSN: 0091-6765; 1552-9924
• DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9059

The probability of nonoccupational exposure to phthalates is high given their use in a vast range of consumables, including personal care products (e.g., perfumes, lotions, cosmetics), paints, industrial plastics, and certain medical devices and pharmaceuticals. Phthalates are of high interest because of their potential for human exposure and because animal toxicity studies suggest that some phthalates affect male reproductive development apparently via inhibition of androgen biosynthesis. In humans, phthalates are rapidly metabolized to their monoesters, which can be further transformed to oxidative products, conjugated, and eliminated. Phthalate metabolites have been used as biomarkers of exposure. Using urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations allows accurate assessments of human exposure because these concentrations represent an integrative measure of exposure to phthalates from multiple sources and routes. However, the health significance of this exposure is unknown. To link biomarker measurements to exposure, internal dose, or health outcome, additional information (e.g., toxicokinetics, inter- and intraindividual differences) is needed. We present a case study using diethyl phthalate and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate as examples to illustrate scientific approaches and their limitations, identify data gaps, and outline research needs for using biomonitoring data in the context of human health risk assessment, with an emphasis on exposure and dose. Although the vast and growing literature on phthalates research could not be covered comprehensively in this article, we made every attempt to include the most relevant publications as of the end of 2005.