Comparison between tripod and skin-fixed recording of scapular motion
Abstract Non-invasive dynamical measurements of 3D scapular motion can be performed easily by attachment of a 6 DOF electromagnetic receiver onto the skin above the acromion. To quantify the introduction of possible errors due to skin displacement, we assessed 3D scapular positions on n = 8 subjects...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of biomechanics Vol. 40; no. 4; pp. 941 - 946 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Ltd
01.01.2007
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Non-invasive dynamical measurements of 3D scapular motion can be performed easily by attachment of a 6 DOF electromagnetic receiver onto the skin above the acromion. To quantify the introduction of possible errors due to skin displacement, we assessed 3D scapular positions on n = 8 subjects by both tripod and skin-fixed method. Error analysis included the variables method (tripod, skin-fixed simultaneously with tripod, separate skin-fixed at 0 and 0.25 Hz of elevation speed), plane of elevation (0° and 90°) and observation (receiver replacement: n = 3 ). Inter-individual ‘group’ differences depended on elevation plane and showed an average underestimation of scapular rotation of 6.5° (worst case 13°) using the skin-fixed method. Only the group RMSE, not the individual RMSE, could be successfully lowered using linear regression (to about 2°). Inter-trial reliability (RMSE <3.24°, ICC>0.94) and RMSE between 0 and 0.25 Hz recordings (about 2.5°) were satisfactory. Intra-observer RMSE after replacement of the skin-fixed receiver was 5°. The skin-fixed method is suitable for dynamic recordings of scapular rotations; however, measurements are precise only when the acromion receiver is not replaced. Combined with a relatively low accuracy, we conclude that the skin-fixed method should be used only in combination with tripod ‘calibration’. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.02.011 |