Systemic and local zoledronic acid treatment with hydroxyapatite bone graft: A histological and histomorphometric experimental study

• Published in: Experimental and therapeutic medicine Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 2417 - 2422
• Main Authors: Günes, Nedim, Dundar, Serkan, Saybak, Arif, Artas, Gökhan, Acikan, Izzet, Ozercan, I. Hanifi, Atilgan, Serhat, Yaman, Ferhan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Greece D.A. Spandidos 01.10.2016; Spandidos Publications; Spandidos Publications UK Ltd
• Subjects: Anesthesia; Bone-grafting; Bones; critical-sized defect; Defects; Dosage and administration; Health aspects; Hydroxyapatite; hydroxyapatite bone graft; rat calvarium; Rodents; Software; Statistical analysis; Studies; Zoledronic acid; hydroxyapatite bone graft; rat calvarium; critical-sized defect; zoledronic acid
• ISSN: 1792-0981; 1792-1015
• DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3685

In this study, the aim was to compare the relative efficacy of systemic and local zoledronic acid (ZA) on a hydroxyapatite (HA) bone graft in a rat critical-size calvarial bone defect. In total, 84 female rats were divided into four groups: Empty control (EC) group with no treatment applied; HA group, in which only HA bone graft material was used in the calvarium; and HA plus local ZA (HA+LZA) and HA plus systemic ZA (HA+SZA) groups, in which animals received ZA locally or systemically, respectively, with HA bone graft material in the calvarium. A 5-mm standardised critical-size calvarial bone defect was created with a standard trephine drill and the respective treatment was applied. Rats were sacrificed 7, 14 and 28 days later. The numbers of osteoclasts and osteoblasts, and degree of bone formation were evaluated histopathologically and histomorphometrically. Statistically significant differences were detected between the HA, HA+LZA and HA+SZA groups and the EC group for new bone formation (P<0.05). Osteoblast numbers in the HA+LZA and HA+SZA groups were significantly higher compared with those in the EC and HA groups (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was detected between the HA+LZA and HA+SZA groups in new bone formation or osteoblast number (P>0.05). Bone formation was significantly higher in the HA group than in the EC group (P<0.05). The numbers of osteoclasts in the HA+LZA and HA+SZA groups were significantly higher than those in the groups EC and HA (P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference between groups HA+LZA and HA+SZA (P>0.05). Within the limitations of this study, systemic or local administration of ZA enhanced new bone formation with a HA bone graft in a rat critical-size calvarial defect model.