An acellular biologic scaffold treatment for volumetric muscle loss: results of a 13-patient cohort study
Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is a severe and debilitating clinical problem. Current standard of care includes physical therapy or orthotics, which do not correct underlying strength deficits, and surgical tendon transfers or muscle transfers, which involve donor site morbidity and fall short of rest...
Saved in:
Published in | npj Regenerative medicine Vol. 1; no. 1; p. 16008 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
21.07.2016
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is a severe and debilitating clinical problem. Current standard of care includes physical therapy or orthotics, which do not correct underlying strength deficits, and surgical tendon transfers or muscle transfers, which involve donor site morbidity and fall short of restoring function. The results of a 13-patient cohort study are described herein and involve a regenerative medicine approach for VML treatment. Acellular bioscaffolds composed of mammalian extracellular matrix (ECM) were implanted and combined with aggressive and early physical therapy following treatment. Immunolabeling of ultrasound-guided biopsies, and magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography imaging were performed to analyse the presence of stem/progenitor cells and formation of new skeletal muscle. Force production, range-of-motion and functional task performance were analysed by physical therapists. Electrodiagnostic evaluation was used to analyse presence of innervated skeletal muscle. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01292876.
In vivo
remodelling of ECM bioscaffolds was associated with mobilisation of perivascular stem cells; formation of new, vascularised, innervated islands of skeletal muscle within the implantation site; increased force production; and improved functional task performance when compared with pre-operative performance. Compared with pre-operative performance, by 6 months after ECM implantation, patients showed an average improvement of 37.3% (
P
<0.05) in strength and 27.1% improvement in range-of-motion tasks (
P
<0.05). Implantation of acellular bioscaffolds derived from ECM can improve strength and function, and promotes site-appropriate remodelling of VML defects. These findings provide early evidence of bioscaffolding as a viable treatment of VML.
Pig tissue stimulates muscle growth in humans
People who have lost muscle could regain some muscle mass, movement and strength by implanting non-cellular supportive material from pig tissue. Jenna Dziki, Stephen Badylak, J. Peter Rubin and other colleagues from the University of Pittsburgh in the United States implanted extracellular matrix–the material secreted by cells to support surrounding tissue–derived from the urinary bladder, small intestine and skin of pigs at the sites of muscle tissue loss in 13 patients, followed by aggressive physiotherapy. Six months after surgery, the team observed an average improvement of 37% in muscle strength, 27% in range of motion tasks, and a 20% or greater improvement in at least one functional task. They found that the implanted supportive matrix degraded, promoted stem cell mobilization and new muscle formation, with an average increase in muscle mass of 27% and improved nerve supply to the area. The results pave the way for new treatments for muscle loss due to tumor removal, accidents or disease. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 S.B., J.P.R., F.A. and M.L.B. designed the human patient treatment protocol; S.B. obtained funding and contributed to histopathologic examination; J.P.R. performed surgical procedures and oversaw the conduct of the clinical trial; F.A. and M.L.B. oversaw the conduct of the EMG testing. M.Y., K.S., E.H.P.B. and F.A. identified impairment and functional outcome variables and performed evaluations. A.W. performed the imaging and biopsies. N.T., B.S. and J.D. collected the muscle biopsies. J.D. and N.T. performed and analysed immunolabeling experiments. J.D. conducted literature searches, created figures and interpreted the data. J.D. and S.B. wrote the manuscript. J.D., S.B., F.A., M.L.B., M.Y., K.S., B.S. and J.P.R. revised the manuscript. These authors contributed equally to this work. |
ISSN: | 2057-3995 2057-3995 |
DOI: | 10.1038/npjregenmed.2016.8 |