Comparison of [18F]DCFPyL and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer

Purpose Gallium-68 (Ga-68)-labeled tracers for imaging expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) such as the [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC have already demonstrated high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. However, compared to Ga-68, a labeling with fluorine-18 (F-1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular imaging and biology Vol. 17; no. 4; pp. 575 - 584
Main Authors Dietlein, Markus, Kobe, Carsten, Kuhnert, Georg, Stockter, Simone, Fischer, Thomas, Schomäcker, Klaus, Schmidt, Matthias, Dietlein, Felix, Zlatopolskiy, Boris D., Krapf, Philipp, Richarz, Raphael, Neubauer, Stephan, Drzezga, Alexander, Neumaier, Bernd
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.08.2015
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose Gallium-68 (Ga-68)-labeled tracers for imaging expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) such as the [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC have already demonstrated high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. However, compared to Ga-68, a labeling with fluorine-18 (F-18) would offer advantages with respect to availability, production amount, and image resolution. [ 18 F]DCFPyL is a promising F-18-labeled candidate for PSMA-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging that has been recently introduced. In the current study, we aimed to compare [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC and [ 18 F]DCFPyL for clinical use in biochemically relapsed prostate cancer. Procedures In 14 selected patients with PSA relapse of prostate cancer, [ 18 F]DCFPyL PET/X-ray computed tomography (CT) was performed in addition to [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. A systematic comparison was carried out between results obtained with both tracers with regard to the number of detected PSMA-positive lesions, the standardized uptake value (SUV) max and the lesion to background ratios. Results All suspicious lesions identified by [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC were also detected with [ 18 F]DCFPyL. In three patients, additional lesions were observed using [ 18 F]DCFPyL PET/CT. The mean SUV max in the concordant [ 18 F]DCFPyL PSMA-positive lesions was significantly higher as compared to [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC (14.5 vs. 12.2, p  = 0.028, n  = 15). The mean tumor to background ratios ( n  = 15) were significantly higher for [ 18 F]DCFPyL compared to [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC using kidney, spleen, or parotid as reference organs ( p  = 0.006, p  = 0.002, p  = 0.008), but no significant differences were found using the liver ( p  = 0.167) or the mediastinum ( p  = 0.363) as reference organs. Conclusion [ 18 F]DCFPyL PET/CT provided a high image quality and visualized small prostate lesions with excellent sensitivity. [ 18 F]DCFPyL represents a highly promising alternative to [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET/CT imaging in relapsed prostate cancer.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1536-1632
1860-2002
DOI:10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0