In vivo monoclonal antibody efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 variant strains
Rapidly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants jeopardize antibody-based countermeasures. Although cell culture experiments have demonstrated a loss of potency of several anti-spike neutralizing antibodies against variant strains of SARS-CoV-2 1 – 3 , the in vivo importance of these results remains uncertain....
Saved in:
Published in | Nature (London) Vol. 596; no. 7870; pp. 103 - 108 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
05.08.2021
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Rapidly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants jeopardize antibody-based countermeasures. Although cell culture experiments have demonstrated a loss of potency of several anti-spike neutralizing antibodies against variant strains of SARS-CoV-2
1
–
3
, the in vivo importance of these results remains uncertain. Here we report the in vitro and in vivo activity of a panel of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which correspond to many in advanced clinical development by Vir Biotechnology, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Regeneron and Lilly, against SARS-CoV-2 variant viruses. Although some individual mAbs showed reduced or abrogated neutralizing activity in cell culture against B.1.351, B.1.1.28, B.1.617.1 and B.1.526 viruses with mutations at residue E484 of the spike protein, low prophylactic doses of mAb combinations protected against infection by many variants in K18-hACE2 transgenic mice, 129S2 immunocompetent mice and hamsters, without the emergence of resistance. Exceptions were LY-CoV555 monotherapy and LY-CoV555 and LY-CoV016 combination therapy, both of which lost all protective activity, and the combination of AbbVie 2B04 and 47D11, which showed a partial loss of activity. When administered after infection, higher doses of several mAb cocktails protected in vivo against viruses with a B.1.351 spike gene. Therefore, many—but not all—of the antibody products with Emergency Use Authorization should retain substantial efficacy against the prevailing variant strains of SARS-CoV-2.
Experiments in mouse and hamster models show that monoclonal antibody combinations, using antibodies that correspond to products in clinical development, largely retain their efficacy in protecting against currently prevailing variant strains of SARS-CoV-2. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS R.E.C. performed and analyzed neutralization assays. R.E.C., E.S.W., and J.B.C. performed mouse experiments. R.E.C., E.S.W., J.B.C., B.Y., and S.S. performed viral burden analyses. X.X. generated the recombinant SARS-CoV-2 viruses. R.E.C. and L.A.V. propagated and validated SARS-CoV-2 viruses. L.D., S.A.H., and D.W. performed deep sequencing analysis. I.D.A. and S.S. performed Sanger sequencing analyses. T.L.D., T.L.B., and A.C.M.B. performed the hamster studies. T.L.D. and A.J performed viral burden and inflammatory gene analysis. J.M.E. and D.H.F. performed structural analysis. Z.L. generated escape mutants. E.S.W. quantified serum antibody concentrations. J.B.C. and T.L.B. performed plaque assays. D.C., P.G., S.J.Z., W.B.S., J.E.C., A.H.E., W.B.S., and L.P. provided mAbs. M.S.S., M.E.D-G., P-Y.S., M.G.K., R.A., and C.Y.C. provided SARS-CoV-2 strains. P.Y.S., A.H.E., D.C., A.C.M.B. and M.S.D. obtained funding and supervised the research. R.E.C, E.S.W., J.B.C., and M.S.D. wrote the initial draft, with the other authors providing editorial comments. |
ISSN: | 0028-0836 1476-4687 1476-4687 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41586-021-03720-y |