During the COVID-19 pandemic participants prefer settings with a face mask, no interaction and at a closer distance

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 12; no. 1; pp. 12777 - 12
• Main Authors: Kühne, K., Fischer, M. H., Jeglinski-Mende, M. A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 27.07.2022; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/477; 631/477/2811; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; COVID-19 - epidemiology; COVID-19 - prevention & control; Face; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Masks; multidisciplinary; Pandemics; Pandemics - prevention & control; Personal Space; Physical Distancing; Protective equipment; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Sensory integration; Social behavior; Social distancing
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16730-1

Peripersonal space is the space surrounding our body, where multisensory integration of stimuli and action execution take place. The size of peripersonal space is flexible and subject to change by various personal and situational factors. The dynamic representation of our peripersonal space modulates our spatial behaviors towards other individuals. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this spatial behavior was modified by two further factors: social distancing and wearing a face mask. Evidence from offline and online studies on the impact of a face mask on pro-social behavior is mixed. In an attempt to clarify the role of face masks as pro-social or anti-social signals, 235 observers participated in the present online study. They watched pictures of two models standing at three different distances from each other (50, 90 and 150 cm), who were either wearing a face mask or not and were either interacting by initiating a hand shake or just standing still. The observers’ task was to classify the model by gender. Our results show that observers react fastest, and therefore show least avoidance, for the shortest distances (50 and 90 cm) but only when models wear a face mask and do not interact. Thus, our results document both pro- and anti-social consequences of face masks as a result of the complex interplay between social distancing and interactive behavior. Practical implications of these findings are discussed.