Maggot debridement therapy with Lucilia cuprina: a comparison with conventional debridement in diabetic foot ulcers

This is prospective case–control study of more than 18 months performed to assess the effectiveness of maggot debridement therapy (MDT) with the sterile larvae of Lucilia cuprina (a tropical blowfly maggot) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Literature thus far has only reported results with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational wound journal Vol. 6; no. 1; pp. 39 - 46
Main Authors Paul, Aaron G, Ahmad, Nazni W, Lee, HL, Ariff, Ashraff M, Saranum, Masri, Naicker, Amara S, Osman, Zulkiflee
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This is prospective case–control study of more than 18 months performed to assess the effectiveness of maggot debridement therapy (MDT) with the sterile larvae of Lucilia cuprina (a tropical blowfly maggot) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Literature thus far has only reported results with the temperate maggot, Lucilia sericata. This study documents outcome in diabetic foot wounds treated with maggot debridement versus those treated by conventional debridement alone. In this series of 29 patients treated with MDT, 14 wounds were healed, 11 were unhealed and 4 were classified under others. The control group treated by conventional debridement had 30 patients of which 18 wounds were healed, 11 unhealed and 1 classified under others. There was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups. The conclusion that can be made from this study is that MDT with L. cuprina is as effective as conventional debridement in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. It would be a feasible alternative to those at high risk for surgery or for those who refuse surgery.
Bibliography:istex:421EE38C3405BB7EA2BDCFF5B50BDC32CC066140
ArticleID:IWJ564
ark:/67375/WNG-129J9VTM-V
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1742-4801
1742-481X
DOI:10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00564.x