Adjuvant Therapy in Pancreas Cancer: Does It Influence Patterns of Recurrence?

Background Level 1 data demonstrate that adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) improves survival after surgical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), (adjuvant gemcitabine, CONKO-001 study; adjuvant 5-FU, ESPAC3 study). The role of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (ACRT) remains controversial....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Surgeons Vol. 222; no. 4; pp. 448 - 456
Main Authors Parikh, Alexander A., MD, MPH, FACS, Maiga, Amelia, MD, MPH, Bentrem, David, MD, FACS, Squires, Malcolm H., MD, Kooby, David A., MD, FACS, Maithel, Shishir K., MD, FACS, Weber, Sharon M., MD, FACS, Cho, Clifford S., MD, FACS, Katz, Matthew, MD, FACS, Martin, Robert C., MD, PhD, FACS, Scoggins, Charles R., MD, MBA, FACS, Sutton, Jeff, MD, Ahmad, Syed A., MD, FACS, Abbott, Daniel E., MD, FACS, Carr, Jacquelyn, MD, Kim, Hong Jin, MD, FACS, Yakoub, Danny, MD, FACS, Idrees, Kamran, MD, FACS, Merchant, Nipun, MD, FACS
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.04.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Level 1 data demonstrate that adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) improves survival after surgical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), (adjuvant gemcitabine, CONKO-001 study; adjuvant 5-FU, ESPAC3 study). The role of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (ACRT) remains controversial. What is less clear is whether adjuvant therapy influences patterns of recurrence. The purpose of this study was to perform the first multicenter study analyzing patterns of recurrence after adjuvant therapy for PDAC. Study Design Patients undergoing resection for PDAC from 8 medical centers over a 10-year period were analyzed. Demographics, tumor characteristics, operative treatment, type of adjuvant therapy, recurrence pattern, and survival were reviewed. Using Cox-proportional hazards multivariate (MV) regression, the impact of ACT and ACRT on overall survival (OS), local recurrence (LR), and distant recurrence (DR) was investigated. Results There were 1,130 patients who were divided into those having surgery alone (n = 392), ACT (n = 291), or ACRT (n = 447). Median follow-up was 18 months. Compared with patients undergoing surgery alone, ACT, but not ACRT, demonstrated a significant OS advantage on MV analysis. Patients receiving ACT had significantly fewer recurrences (LR and DR); those receiving ACRT had significantly less LR but not DR. On subset MV analysis, ACT and ACRT resulted in less LR in patients with lymph node (LN) positive and margin negative disease. No improvements in LR, DR, or OS were seen in margin positive patients with either ACT or ACRT. Conclusions This is the first analysis demonstrating differences in recurrence patterns in PDAC patients based on type of adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy provided an OS advantage likely related to its effect on reducing both LR and DR. Adjuvant chemoradiation therapy appears to decrease LR, but not DR, and therefore has less impact on OS. Future investigations and treatment protocols should consider additional ACT rather than ACRT in the treatment of PDAC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Analysis and interpretation of data: Parikh, Bentrem, Kooby, Maithel, Weber, Cho, Katz, Martin, Scoggins, Ahmad, Abbott, Kim, Yakoub, Idrees, Merchant
Drafting of manuscript: Parikh, Maiga, Bentrem, Kooby, Maithel, Weber, Cho, Katz, Matin, Scoggins, Ahmad, Abbott, Kim, Merchant
Critical revision: Parikh, Bentrem, Kooby, Maithel, Weber, Cho, Katz, Martin, Scoggins, Ahmad, Abbott, Kim, Yakoub, Merchant
Study conception and design: Parikh, Bentrem, Kooby, Weber, Martin, Ahmad, Kim, Merchant
Acquisition of data: Parikh, Maiga, Bentrem, Squires, Kooby, Maithel, Weber, Cho, Katz, Martin, Scoggins, Sutton, Ahmad, Abbott, Carr, Kim, Idrees, Merchant
Author Contributions
ISSN:1072-7515
1879-1190
DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.031