Between- and Within-Subjects Predictors of the Kilocalorie Content of Bites of Food

• Published in: Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Vol. 119; no. 7; pp. 1109 - 1117
• Main Authors: Salley, James N., Hoover, Adam W., Muth, Eric R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2019
• Subjects: Bite count; body mass index; eating habits; Energy intake; females; Free-living; Microstructural analysis; mouth; satiety; Self-monitoring; Energy intake; Self-monitoring; Free-living; Microstructural analysis; Bite count
• ISSN: 2212-2672; 2212-2680
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.12.009

This study builds on previous research that seeks to estimate kilocalorie intake through microstructural analysis of eating behaviors. As opposed to previous methods, which used a static, individual-based measure of kilocalories per bite, the new method incorporates time- and food-varying predictors. A measure of kilocalories per bite (KPB) was estimated using between- and within-subjects variables. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between within-subjects and between-subjects predictors and KPB, and to develop a model of KPB that improves over previous models of KPB. Within-subjects predictors included time since last bite, food item enjoyment, premeal satiety, and time in meal. Between-subjects predictors included body mass index, mouth volume, and sex. Seventy-two participants (39 female) consumed two random meals out of five possible meal options with known weights and energy densities. There were 4,051 usable bites measured. The outcome measure of the first analysis was KPB. The outcome measure of the second analysis was meal-level kilocalorie intake, with true intake compared to three estimation methods. Multilevel modeling was used to analyze the influence of the seven predictors of KPB. The accuracy of the model was compared to previous methods of estimating KPB using a repeated-measured analysis of variance. All hypothesized relationships were significant, with slopes in the expected direction, except for body mass index and time in meal. In addition, the new model (with nonsignificant predictors removed) improved over earlier models of KPB. This model offers a new direction for methods of inexpensive, accurate, and objective estimates of kilocalorie intake from bite-based measures.