Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla

• Published in: Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Vol. 286; no. 1906; p. 20190831
• Main Authors: Laumer, Christopher E, Fernández, Rosa, Lemer, Sarah, Combosch, David, Kocot, Kevin M, Riesgo, Ana, Andrade, Sónia C S, Sterrer, Wolfgang, Sørensen, Martin V, Giribet, Gonzalo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England The Royal Society 10.07.2019
• Subjects: Animals; Classification; Evolution; Genomics; Phylogeny; compositional bias; matrix recoding; taxon sampling; animal phylogeny; phylogenomics
• ISSN: 0962-8452; 1471-2954
• DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0831

Proper biological interpretation of a phylogeny can sometimes hinge on the placement of key taxa-or fail when such key taxa are not sampled. In this light, we here present the first attempt to investigate (though not conclusively resolve) animal relationships using genome-scale data from all phyla. Results from the site-heterogeneous CAT + GTR model recapitulate many established major clades, and strongly confirm some recent discoveries, such as a monophyletic Lophophorata, and a sister group relationship between Gnathifera and Chaetognatha, raising continued questions on the nature of the spiralian ancestor. We also explore matrix construction with an eye towards testing specific relationships; this approach uniquely recovers support for Panarthropoda, and shows that Lophotrochozoa (a subclade of Spiralia) can be constructed in strongly conflicting ways using different taxon- and/or orthologue sets. Dayhoff-6 recoding sacrifices information, but can also reveal surprising outcomes, e.g. full support for a clade of Lophophorata and Entoprocta + Cycliophora, a clade of Placozoa + Cnidaria, and raising support for Ctenophora as sister group to the remaining Metazoa, in a manner dependent on the gene and/or taxon sampling of the matrix in question. Future work should test the hypothesis that the few remaining uncertainties in animal phylogeny might reflect violations of the various stationarity assumptions used in contemporary inference methods.