Network Context and Selection in the Evolution to Enzyme Specificity

Enzymes are thought to have evolved highly specific catalytic activities from promiscuous ancestral proteins. By analyzing a genome-scale model of Escherichia coli metabolism, we found that 37% of its enzymes act on a variety of substrates and catalyze 65% of the known metabolic reactions. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScience (American Association for the Advancement of Science) Vol. 337; no. 6098; pp. 1101 - 1104
Main Authors Nam, Hojung, Lewis, Nathan E., Lerman, Joshua A., Lee, Dae-Hee, Chang, Roger L., Kim, Donghyuk, Palsson, Bernhard O.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Association for the Advancement of Science 31.08.2012
The American Association for the Advancement of Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Enzymes are thought to have evolved highly specific catalytic activities from promiscuous ancestral proteins. By analyzing a genome-scale model of Escherichia coli metabolism, we found that 37% of its enzymes act on a variety of substrates and catalyze 65% of the known metabolic reactions. However, it is not apparent why these generalist enzymes remain. Here, we show that there are marked differences between generalist enzymes anf specialist enzymes, known to catalyze a single chemical reaction on one particular substrate in vivo. Specialist enzymes (i) are frequently essential, (ii) maintain higher metabolic flux, and (iii) require more regulation of enzyme activity to control metabolic flux in dynamic environments than do generalist enzymes. Furthermore, these properties are conserved in Archaea and Eukarya. Thus, the metabolic network context and environmental conditions influence enzyme evolution toward high specificity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Current address: Systems and Synthetic Biology Research Center. Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, 125 Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-806, Korea
The first two authors contributed equally.
ISSN:0036-8075
1095-9203
DOI:10.1126/science.1216861