Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neonatal outcomes in future pregnancies

Objective: To assess maternal postpartum and neonatal outcomes associated with previous method of delivery. Study Design: We analyzed prospectively collected maternal and neonatal data from July 2002 to December 2003. Data were collected from dedicated perinatal database and neonatal database from d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of perinatology Vol. 29; no. 11; pp. 726 - 730
Main Authors Galyean, A M, Lagrew, D C, Bush, M C, Kurtzman, J T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Nature Publishing Group US 01.11.2009
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: To assess maternal postpartum and neonatal outcomes associated with previous method of delivery. Study Design: We analyzed prospectively collected maternal and neonatal data from July 2002 to December 2003. Data were collected from dedicated perinatal database and neonatal database from discharge and procedure codes. Groups were: (i) multiparous, prior vaginal delivery (VD), and (ii) multiparous, prior cesarean (CS). This group was subdivided by subsequent pregnancy trial or no trial of labor (No TOL). Results were compared with χ 2 -analysis; significance P <0.05. Results: There were 17 406 births. Prior CS patients without trial of labor (TOL) required more blood transfusions, intensive care unit admissions and hospital readmissions than women with a prior VD. Prior CS patients with TOL required more aminoglycosides for postpartum infection. Term neonates of (CS) mothers without a TOL were more likely to have prolonged hospitalization and require ventilatory support. Conclusions: In their subsequent delivery, women with a prior CS delivery are at significant risks for postpartum maternal and neonatal morbidities compared with parous patients who experienced a prior VD.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0743-8346
1476-5543
DOI:10.1038/jp.2009.108