Quality of Patient-Physician Discussions About CKD in Primary Care: A Cross-sectional Study

Background The quality of patient-physician discussions about chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care has not been studied previously. Study Design Cross-sectional study. Settings & Participants We audiotaped encounters between 236 patients with hypertension and their primary care physician...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of kidney diseases Vol. 57; no. 4; pp. 583 - 591
Main Authors Greer, Raquel C., MD, MHS, Cooper, Lisa A., MD, MPH, Crews, Deidra C., MD, ScM, Powe, Neil R., MD, MPH, MBA, Boulware, L. Ebony, MD, MPH
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.04.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background The quality of patient-physician discussions about chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care has not been studied previously. Study Design Cross-sectional study. Settings & Participants We audiotaped encounters between 236 patients with hypertension and their primary care physicians (n = 40). Predictors Patient, physician, and encounter characteristics. Outcomes & Measurements We described the occurrence and characteristics (content, use of technical terms, and physician assessment of patient comprehension of new concepts) of CKD discussions. We assessed patient and physician characteristics associated with CKD discussion occurrence. Results Many patients (mean age, 59 years) had uncontrolled hypertension (51%), diabetes (44%), and/or 3 or more comorbid conditions (51%). Most primary care physicians practiced (52%) fewer than 10 years. CKD discussions occurred in few (26%; n = 61) encounters, with content focused on laboratory assessment (89%), risk-factor treatment (28%), and causes (26%) of CKD. In encounters that included a CKD discussion, physicians used technical terms (28%; n = 17) and rarely assessed patients' comprehension (2%; n = 1). CKD discussions were statistically significantly less common in visits of patients with some (vs no) college education (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09-0.56), with 3 or more (vs fewer) comorbid conditions (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.96), and who saw physicians with more (vs fewer) than 10 years of practice experience (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21-0.80). CKD discussions were more common during longer encounters (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.65) and encounters in which diabetes was (vs was not) discussed (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.22-6.77). Limitations Generalizability of our findings may be limited. Conclusions Patient-physician discussions about CKD in high-risk primary care patients were infrequent. Physicians used technical terms and infrequently assessed patients' understanding of new CKD concepts. Efforts to improve the frequency and content of patient-physician CKD discussions in primary care could improve patients' clinical outcomes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0272-6386
1523-6838
DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.08.027