Weak and strong publics: drawing on Nancy Fraser to explore parental participation in neonatal networks

• Published in: Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 104 - 115
• Main Authors: Gibson, Andrew J., Lewando‐Hundt, Gillian, Blaxter, Loraine
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2014
• Subjects: Advisory Committees - organization & administration; Attitude of Health Personnel; Citizen participation; Community Participation - methods; Decision Making; England; Fraser; Health Policy; Humans; Infant Care - organization & administration; Infant Care - standards; Infant, Newborn; managed clinical networks; neonatal care; Original Research Papers; Parental participation; Parents; patient and public involvement; Patient participation; Politics; State Medicine - organization & administration; United Kingdom > UK; England; managed clinical networks; health policy; Fraser; patient and public involvement; neonatal care
• ISSN: 1369-6513; 1369-7625
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00735.x

Aims  We draw on the work of Nancy Fraser, and in particular her concepts of weak and strong publics, to analyze the process of parental involvement in managed neonatal network boards. Background  Public involvement has moved beyond the individual level to include greater involvement of both patients and the public in governance. However, there is relatively little literature that explores the nature and outcomes of long‐term patient involvement initiatives or has attempted to theorize, particularly at the level of corporate decision making, the process of patient and public involvement. Methods  A repeated survey of all neonatal network managers in England was carried out in 2006–07 to capture developments and changes in parental representation over this time period. This elicited information about the current status of parent representation on neonatal network boards. Four networks were also selected as case studies. This involved interviews with key members of each network board, interviews with parent representatives, observation of meetings and access to board minutes. Results  Data collected show that a wide range of approaches to involving parents has been adopted. These range from decisions not to involve parents at this level to relatively well‐developed systems designed to link parent representatives on network boards to parents in neonatal units. Conclusion  Despite these variations, we suggest that parental participation within neonatal services remains an example of a weak public because the parent representatives had limited participation with little influence on decision making.