Pooled analysis of large and long-term safety data from the human papillomavirus-16/18-AS04-adjuvanted vaccine clinical trial programme

ABSTRACT Purpose The purpose of this study is to further evaluate the safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV)‐16/18‐AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine (HPV‐16/18‐vaccine Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium) through a pooled analysis of data from 42 completed/ongoing clinical studies. Methods Unsolicited adver...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPharmacoepidemiology and drug safety Vol. 23; no. 5; pp. 466 - 479
Main Authors Angelo, Maria-Genalin, David, Marie-Pierre, Zima, Julia, Baril, Laurence, Dubin, Gary, Arellano, Felix, Struyf, Frank
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2014
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Purpose The purpose of this study is to further evaluate the safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV)‐16/18‐AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine (HPV‐16/18‐vaccine Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium) through a pooled analysis of data from 42 completed/ongoing clinical studies. Methods Unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were reported for 30 days after each dose. Medically significant conditions, serious AEs (SAEs), potential immune‐mediated diseases (pIMDs) and pregnancy outcomes were captured until study completion. Events leading to subject withdrawal were reviewed. Relative risks compared incidences of spontaneous abortion and pIMDs in controlled studies. Results Thirty one thousand one hundred seventy‐three adolescent girls/women received HPV‐16/18‐vaccine alone (HPV group), 2166 received HPV‐16/18‐vaccine coadministered with another vaccine and 24 241 were controls. Mean follow‐up was 39 months (range 0–113.3). Incidences of unsolicited AEs reported within 30 days after any dose were similar between HPV and Control groups (30.8%/29.7%). During the entire study period, reports of medically significant conditions (25.0%/28.3%) and SAEs (7.9%/9.3%) were also similarly distributed between groups. Deaths were rare: HPV (alone/coadministered) n = 25, controls n = 20 (n = 18 in blinded groups). pIMDs within 1 year were reported by 0.2% of HPV‐16/18 vaccinees and controls. For each pIMD event category, no increased relative risks were reported for HPV‐16/18 vaccinees versus controls. Coadministration did not change the overall safety profile. Pregnancy outcomes and withdrawal rates were similar between groups. Conclusions Analysis of safety data arising from 57 580 subjects and 96 704 HPV‐16/18‐vaccine doses shows that the incidences and distribution of AEs were similar among HPV‐16/18‐vaccine recipients and controls. No new safety signals were identified. The data confirm previous findings that HPV‐16/18‐vaccine has an acceptable benefit‐risk profile in adolescent girls and adult women. © 2014 GlaxoSmithKline. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA
ark:/67375/WNG-5R61642Q-H
ArticleID:PDS3554
istex:EA90A550A40816E4ECAE66E55965407E216D3D89
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1053-8569
1099-1557
1099-1557
DOI:10.1002/pds.3554