Trusting Sources of Information on Quality of Physician Care

• Published in: Inquiry (Chicago) Vol. 57; pp. 4695802095291 - 46958020952912
• Main Authors: Moore, Ami R., Hudson, Cassie, Amey, Foster, Chumbler, Neale
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 2020; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC; SAGE Publishing
• Subjects: Chronic illnesses; Companies; Consumers; Data quality; Employers; Employment; Factor analysis; Government agencies; Health care expenditures; Health care industry; Health care policy; Health services; Influence; Information sources; Insurance; Older people; Original Research; Patients; Physicians; Political identity; Quality of care; Ratings & rankings; Social networks; Sociodemographics; Trust; Websites; healthcare quality; data sources; physician providers; trust in information; United States
• ISSN: 0046-9580; 1945-7243
• DOI: 10.1177/0046958020952912

Reporting healthcare quality has become an important factor in healthcare delivery. Prior research has shown that patient-consumers do not frequently use information on websites reporting physician quality to guide their choice of physicians. Our aim is to understand the contextual and personal characteristics that influence patient-consumers’ decisions to trust or ignore information sources about healthcare quality. We use data from Finding Quality Doctors: How Americans Evaluate Provider Quality in the US, 2014, to examine factors that explain trust in sources reporting healthcare quality provided by physicians. Using factor analysis, 3 overarching information sources were identified: (1) employers and healthcare providers; (2) user advocacy sources; and (3) insurance companies and government. We use multiple regression analysis to understand the factors that impact trust in these 3 information sources. Our study found that contrary to previous findings, health status was not a significant factor that affects trust in sources reporting care quality data. Also, age was the only factor that significantly correlated with trusting information from all 3 sources. Specifically, younger adults trusted information from all sources compared to older adults. Furthermore, political affiliation, employment status, income, and area of residence correlated with trusting care quality information from either companies and government agencies or family and social network sources. Results suggest that individual and contextual characteristics are significant factors in trusting information sources regardless of health status and these should be taken into consideration by those promoting public reporting of healthcare quality information.