Population structure of two rabies hosts relative to the known distribution of rabies virus variants in Alaska

For pathogens that infect multiple species, the distinction between reservoir hosts and spillover hosts is often difficult. In Alaska, three variants of the arctic rabies virus exist with distinct spatial distributions. We tested the hypothesis that rabies virus variant distribution corresponds to t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular ecology Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 675 - 688
Main Authors Goldsmith, Elizabeth W, Renshaw, Benjamin, Clement, Christopher J, Himschoot, Elizabeth A, Hundertmark, Kris J, Hueffer, Karsten
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Scientific Publications 01.02.2016
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For pathogens that infect multiple species, the distinction between reservoir hosts and spillover hosts is often difficult. In Alaska, three variants of the arctic rabies virus exist with distinct spatial distributions. We tested the hypothesis that rabies virus variant distribution corresponds to the population structure of the primary rabies hosts in Alaska, arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) to possibly distinguish reservoir and spillover hosts. We used mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence and nine microsatellites to assess population structure in those two species. mtDNA structure did not correspond to rabies virus variant structure in either species. Microsatellite analyses gave varying results. Bayesian clustering found two groups of arctic foxes in the coastal tundra region, but for red foxes it identified tundra and boreal types. Spatial Bayesian clustering and spatial principal components analysis identified 3 and 4 groups of arctic foxes, respectively, closely matching the distribution of rabies virus variants in the state. Red foxes, conversely, showed eight clusters comprising two regions (boreal and tundra) with much admixture. These results run contrary to previous beliefs that arctic fox show no fine‐scale spatial population structure. While we cannot rule out that the red fox is part of the maintenance host community for rabies in Alaska, the distribution of virus variants appears to be driven primarily by the arctic fox. Therefore, we show that host population genetics can be utilized to distinguish between maintenance and spillover hosts when used in conjunction with other approaches.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.13509
ArticleID:MEC13509
National Institute of General Medical Sciences - No. 8P20GM103395-12; No. RL5MD009600; No. TL4MD009628; No. 1UL1MD009610
ark:/67375/WNG-7H63M2PN-C
Alaska INBRE
Fig. S1 Arctic fox and red fox samples collected for mitochondrial DNA sequencing and microsatellite analysis throughout Alaska. Fig. S2 structure harvester output for arctic foxes from Pritchard's et al. () ad hoc method (top graph) and the method of Evanno et al. (; bottom graph). Fig. S3 structure harvester output for red foxes from Pritchard's et al. () ad hoc method (top graph) and the method of Evanno et al. (; bottom graph). Table S1 Sample distribution for mtDNA and microsatellites by species and year. Table S2 Frequency of occurrence of haplotypes for tundra (R2, R3, and R4) vs. boreal (Southcentral and Interior) red foxes. Table S3 Museum catalogue numbers and URL for specimen information.
istex:D2C58A715C69EC9A6181821F2705C1BD1972C6DF
National Center for Research Resources - No. 5P20RR016466
UAF Office of Undergraduate Research and Scholarly Activities
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0962-1083
1365-294X
DOI:10.1111/mec.13509