Extremely long-term memory and familiarity after 12 years

In 2006 Mitchell demonstrated that implicit memory was robust to decay. He showed that the ability to identify fragments of pictures seen 17 years before was significantly higher than for new stimuli. Is this true only for implicit memory? In this study, we tested whether explicit memory was still p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCognition Vol. 170; pp. 254 - 262
Main Authors Larzabal, Christelle, Tramoni, Eve, Muratot, Sophie, Thorpe, Simon J., Barbeau, Emmanuel J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.01.2018
Elsevier Science Ltd
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In 2006 Mitchell demonstrated that implicit memory was robust to decay. He showed that the ability to identify fragments of pictures seen 17 years before was significantly higher than for new stimuli. Is this true only for implicit memory? In this study, we tested whether explicit memory was still possible for drawings (n = 144) that had been presented once or three times, two seconds each time on average, approximately 12 years earlier. Surprisingly, our data reveal that our participants were able to recognize pictures above chance level. Preserved memory was mainly observed in the youngest subjects, for stimuli seen three times. Despite the fact that confidence judgments were low, reports suggest that recognition could be based on a strong sense of familiarity. These data extend Mitchell’s findings and show that familiarity can also be robust to decay.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMCID: PMC5730537
ISSN:0010-0277
1873-7838
1873-7838
DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.009