Prescriptions for Potentially Inappropriate Medications from the Beers Criteria Among Older Adults Hospitalized for Heart Failure
We sought to better understand patterns of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) from the Beers criteria among older adults hospitalized with heart failure (HF). This observational study of hospitalizations was derived from the geographically diverse REasons for Geographic and Racial Differen...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cardiac failure Vol. 28; no. 6; pp. 906 - 915 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.06.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We sought to better understand patterns of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) from the Beers criteria among older adults hospitalized with heart failure (HF). This observational study of hospitalizations was derived from the geographically diverse REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke cohort.
We examined participants aged 65 years and older with an expert-adjudicated hospitalization for HF. The Beers criteria medications were abstracted from medical records. The prevalence of PIMs was 61.1% at admission and 64.0% at discharge. Participants were taking a median of 1 PIM (interquartile range [IQR] 0–1 PIM) at hospital admission and a median of 1 PIM (IQR 0–2 PIM) at hospital discharge. Between admission and discharge, 19.1% of patients experienced an increase in the number of PIMs, 15.1% experienced a decrease, and 37% remained on the same number between hospital admission and discharge. The medications with the greatest increase from admission to discharge were proton pump inhibitors (32.6% to 38.6%) and amiodarone (6.2% to 12.2%). The strongest determinant of potentially harmful prescribing patterns was polypharmacy (relative risk 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.16–1.55, P < .001).
PIMs are common among older adults hospitalized for HF and may be an important target to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.
[Display omitted] |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Administrative, technical, or material support: Levitan, Maurer, Lachs, Safford, Goyal Statistical analysis: Ringel Dr. Goyal had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Jaber, Vargas, Nguyen, Zarzuela, Musse, Kwak, Goyal Drafting of the manuscript: Jaber, Vargas, Goyal All authors meet the criteria for authorship stated in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. Study supervision: Maurer, Lachs, Safford, Goyal Author Contributions Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors Study concept and design: Jaber, Nguyen, Zarzuela, Musse, Goyal |
ISSN: | 1071-9164 1532-8414 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.11.014 |