A Randomized Comparison of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis
A Randomized Comparison of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis Andrejs Erglis, Inga Narbute, Indulis Kumsars, Sanda Jegere, Iveta Mintale, Ilja Zakke, Uldis Strazdins, Andris Saltups To optimize percutaneous coronary inte...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 50; no. 6; pp. 491 - 497 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
07.08.2007
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A Randomized Comparison of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis Andrejs Erglis, Inga Narbute, Indulis Kumsars, Sanda Jegere, Iveta Mintale, Ilja Zakke, Uldis Strazdins, Andris Saltups To optimize percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main (LM) disease we randomized intravascular ultrasound-guided bare metal stent (BMS; (n = 50) or paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES; n = 53) implantation after lesion pre-treatment with cutting balloon for unprotected LM lesions. Stent implantation was successful in all lesions. At 6 months’ follow-up, statistically significant benefits were observed in minimal lumen diameter late loss, in minimal lumen area late loss and neointimal volume for PES. At 6 months, major adverse cardiac event-free survival rate was 70% in the BMS group and 87% in the PES group (p = 0.036). Findings of this study demonstrate PES superiority to BMS in unprotected LM vessel. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.055 |