Biomechanical comparison of plantar-to-dorsal and dorsal-to-plantar screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis
To compare screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis. Eight matched pairs of cadaver feet underwent subtalar joint arthrodesis with two 7.3mm cannulated screws. Randomization was used to assign screw orientation, such that one foot in each pair was assigned dorsal to plantar screw orientation...
Saved in:
Published in | Einstein (São Paulo, Brazil) Vol. 18; p. e0AO5052 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Brazil
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
01.01.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To compare screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis.
Eight matched pairs of cadaver feet underwent subtalar joint arthrodesis with two 7.3mm cannulated screws. Randomization was used to assign screw orientation, such that one foot in each pair was assigned dorsal to plantar screw orientation (DP Group), and the other foot, plantar to dorsal orientation (PD Group). Standard surgical technique with fluoroscopy was used for each approach. Following fixation, each specimen was loaded to failure with a Bionix ® 858 MTS device, applying a downward axial force at a distance to create torque. Torque to failure was compared between DP and PD Groups using Student's t test, with p=0.05 used to determine statistical significance.
Statistical analysis demonstrated that the mean torque to failure slightly favored the DP Group (37.3Nm) to the PD Group (32.2Nm). However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p=0.55).
In subtalar arthrodesis, there is no significant difference in construct strength between dorsal-to-plantar and plantar-to-dorsal screw orientation. The approach chosen by the surgeon should be based on factors other than the biomechanical strength of the screw orientation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 Each individual author contributed individually and significantly to the development of this work. NC: wrote and reviewed the article; ALGS: contributed to the interpretation of data, critical revision; CCN: contributed to the critical revision; RR: contributed to the acquisition of data, SD: contributed to the interpretation of data; JKH wrote and reviewed the article; HK: collected the data and performed statistical analysis; GSF: collected the data and performed statistical analysis; EAP: contributed to revision and submission; AS: contributed to the interpretation of data, critical revision, and the intellectual concept of the study and the entire research project. Conflict of interest: none. AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION |
ISSN: | 1679-4508 2317-6385 2317-6385 |
DOI: | 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5052 |