On the temporal and functional origin of l2 disadvantages in speech production: a critical review

Despite a large amount of psycholinguistic research devoted to the issue of processing differences between a first and a second language, there is no consensus regarding the locus where these emerge or the mechanism behind them. The aim of this article is to briefly examine both the behavioral and n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 2; p. 379
Main Authors Runnqvist, Elin, Strijkers, Kristof, Sadat, Jasmin, Costa, Albert
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media 01.01.2011
Frontiers Research Foundation
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Despite a large amount of psycholinguistic research devoted to the issue of processing differences between a first and a second language, there is no consensus regarding the locus where these emerge or the mechanism behind them. The aim of this article is to briefly examine both the behavioral and neuroscientific evidence in order to critically assess three hypotheses that have been put forward in the literature to explain such differences: the weaker links, executive control, and post-lexical accounts. We conclude that (a) while all stages of processing are likely to be slowed down when speaking in an L2 compared to an L1, the differences seem to originate at a lexical stage; and (b) frequency of use seems to be the variable mainly responsible for these bilingual processing disadvantages.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Guillaume Thierry, Bangor University, UK; Yan Jing Wu, Bangor University, UK
This article was submitted to Frontiers in Language Sciences, a specialty of Frontiers in Psychology.
Edited by: Guillaume Thierry, Bangor University, UK
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00379